you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]IridescentAnaconda 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sadly, that is just a statistical analysis.
It is not a solution, as scientists will just add another level of statistical manipulation.

Here is a good article about how the medical industry uses statistical manipulation:
https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702

It is probably more profitable to manipulate statistics than to make a better medicine.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sadly, that is just a statistical analysis.

I realize. But pharma companies are obligated to justify via 'real world evidence' that the drugs work as marketed, even after regulatory approval. This is supposed to help solve the problem. Biopharma needs more advanced statistical methods because human beings are, you know, messy.

It does demonstrate that some people are aware of the epistemological problem.