all 2 comments

[–]zyxzevn[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Could not find the full source, but this fraud with PCR could already suspected.
Without the PCR tests, there was no clear difference between those with the experimental mRNA and those without. (See Peter Doshi, Brittish Medical Journal) A maximum of 19% with different groups.
And these groups of 400 are already selected from 40,000 people (or more) that took part in the test. In these large groups we already saw very damaging side-effects. But those were carefully ignored.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Update: Image of the CDC-document that refers to it
The number of cycles must be <=28 for people who are vaccinated.

Link to the tweet: https://twitter.com/roccogalatilaw/status/1388227807994683393

Link to the CDC page: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/Information-for-laboratories-COVID-vaccine-breakthrough-case-investigation.pdf

The hoax of PCR-cycles shown in a simple image.
https://imgur.com/a/ZDnYhH0
Related study: http://www.ncbi.nim.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185831/

This is extreme fraud!