Up to 500,000 Dead from a Headache Pill: The Pharmaceutical Mafia and Merck's Drug of Death by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'm quite woolly.

Up to 500,000 Dead from a Headache Pill: The Pharmaceutical Mafia and Merck's Drug of Death by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]Horrux 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

hare-brained.

Up to 500,000 Dead from a Headache Pill: The Pharmaceutical Mafia and Merck's Drug of Death by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]SMCAB 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

YOU KNOW WHAT! BIG PHARMA IS EVIL! THIS IS INSANITY AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL AND ALSO VERY FUCKING RACIST! I FEEL BIGOTRY! BIGOT MY RACIST ASS TOXIC BIGOT! ASS!

No, I cannot draw parallels from this or any other wrongdoing when it comes to Covid. Why do you ask? That was a completely benevolent act, by $cience, and Lord Fauci.

Racists the whole lot of you.

Up to 500,000 Dead from a Headache Pill: The Pharmaceutical Mafia and Merck's Drug of Death by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]JasonCarswell 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Years ago I'd already compiled some lists:
https://infogalactic.com/info/Truther_Top_20s
https://infogalactic.com/info/Truther_Newbie_Crash_Course

A few days ago I had another hair-brained idea to try to reach the normies.

What if we made it more exciting?

" World Records Of Mayhem And Corruption "

PFizer would be at the top of several lists.

Most Journalists are Scientifically Unqualified by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So are most of the "scientists".

ABIM: "There shall be no public accountability on our decision to de-certify Dr. McCullough" by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IMissPorn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Decertify ABIM.

ABIM: "There shall be no public accountability on our decision to de-certify Dr. McCullough" by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]SMCAB 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree! Jab me harder! I'm on an insulin pump that courses that sweet, sweet elixir straight into my heart. I feel fucking great!

ABIM: "There shall be no public accountability on our decision to de-certify Dr. McCullough" by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. Lord Fauci is The Science.
And even when he produces shit, we have to swallow it.

ABIM: "There shall be no public accountability on our decision to de-certify Dr. McCullough" by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's what he gets for questioning the Science. Truth is what the committee says it is, comrade!

The problem of model lock-in by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IridescentAnaconda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sadly, that is just a statistical analysis.

I realize. But pharma companies are obligated to justify via 'real world evidence' that the drugs work as marketed, even after regulatory approval. This is supposed to help solve the problem. Biopharma needs more advanced statistical methods because human beings are, you know, messy.

It does demonstrate that some people are aware of the epistemological problem.

The problem of model lock-in by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sadly, that is just a statistical analysis.
It is not a solution, as scientists will just add another level of statistical manipulation.

Here is a good article about how the medical industry uses statistical manipulation:
https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702

It is probably more profitable to manipulate statistics than to make a better medicine.

$cientists and censor$hip by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]Tom9152 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

66% of climate scientists say there's no evidence of human caused global warming.

Survival Heuristics: Avoiding Intelligence Traps (or science traps) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A CIA analyst who has a long experience of solving problems.
Her points also apply to science and corruption in science.
What can we learn?
These are the topics that she covers.

The streetlight effect
Trends are always about the past
Graffiti
Most things don't happen by chance
Exponential causality
Worst case doesn't mean it's unlikely
The probability of something occurring is independent from the consequences that that event may have, right?
Don't drone on with technical explanations and facts, use compelling stories and examples tot make the point you want to make.
They never run out of bullets
Emotions can kill
Construct and constantly revise your analytic landscapes
Know Your Thinking style
Cause-effect relationship: - Concrete Sequential (CS) - Abstract Random (AR) - Abstract Sequential (AS) - Concrete Random (CR)
Deploy Diversity of Thought (Organizations that allow for a lot of different ideas, have better outcomes, even when the dissenters are wrong)
Think Together from the Start
Respect Your Intuition

Tyranny of the Modelers - Robert Malone by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Everything they do with covid models they have been doing for decades with climate models.

How the FDA justified rejecting an EUA for fluvoxamine by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]HongKongPhooey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They have some terrible reasoning obviously, and we know the FDA is full of shit, but I would not recommend SSRI's for covid. Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D, and many other compounds were at least this effective without the brain chemistry altering baggage of taking psychiatric drugs.

I was on an SSRI called Sertraline for over a decade, all while I was under the age of 19. I identified as "aroace" (asexual and incapable of love) from 12 to 18, and still have very little sensation in my genitals because of what Sertraline did to me. This post checks out. by CleverFoolOfEarth in CorruptScience

[–]Horrux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Once I went to the doc because of the extreme exhaustion, which was in fact caused by a massive mercury poisoning, but I only figured that out about 20 years later.

The doc prescribed me an antidepressant. I don't know why, I wasn't depressed, I was EXHAUSTED. It's a different thing, isn't it? I think it was Zoloft, or something else. It wasn't Prozac.

So I took half a pill and it made me want to murder people, to have blood running in the streets around me. I am a very peace-loving and kind individual, normally. I even became a bodybuilder because violence is not in my nature.

But this... Made me feel like a bloothirsty fucking monster.

Never again. I am absolutely doubtful of anything coming off the hellish chemical warfare plants of the pharmaceutical industry.

I was on an SSRI called Sertraline for over a decade, all while I was under the age of 19. I identified as "aroace" (asexual and incapable of love) from 12 to 18, and still have very little sensation in my genitals because of what Sertraline did to me. This post checks out. by CleverFoolOfEarth in CorruptScience

[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay. For a moment it sounded like you were trying it by yourself. I've seen that go wrong with people near me, hence my concern.

I was on an SSRI called Sertraline for over a decade, all while I was under the age of 19. I identified as "aroace" (asexual and incapable of love) from 12 to 18, and still have very little sensation in my genitals because of what Sertraline did to me. This post checks out. by CleverFoolOfEarth in CorruptScience

[–]LarrySwinger2 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't figure out how to get off them by yourself. Do it under the guidance of your doctor. Yes, doctors got you on them in the first place, but they can help you get off them as well.

I was on an SSRI called Sertraline for over a decade, all while I was under the age of 19. I identified as "aroace" (asexual and incapable of love) from 12 to 18, and still have very little sensation in my genitals because of what Sertraline did to me. This post checks out. by CleverFoolOfEarth in CorruptScience

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's either corrupt doctors looking for money, a control conspiracy (that shit is like a sledgehammer to all the shit that makes ya a functional person and not just a functional cog in the globohomo machine), or a depopulation conspiracy (rarely dangerous, just does what I already said it does, it's invisible dysgenics, mood disorders like anxiety and depression are suffered by an outsize proportion of high-IQ people), take your pick.

I was on an SSRI called Sertraline for over a decade, all while I was under the age of 19. I identified as "aroace" (asexual and incapable of love) from 12 to 18, and still have very little sensation in my genitals because of what Sertraline did to me. This post checks out. by CleverFoolOfEarth in CorruptScience

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was on multiple antidepressants decades ago, I thought they just didn't work on me, then I started reading the actual studies. It's one of the reasons I didn't want to work in the pharmaceutical industry anymore. I couldn't give people those pills knowing they were bad.

I don't know know how everyone didn't have a problem with these things. The studies were tiny. Results were self reported. They don't look great to begin with, but then later it comes out these were cherry picked studies. A lot of studies showed no benefit.

And if you try to say anything they brand you a whacko. This isn't new. We have known these drugs suck for two decades. We know the chemical imbalance theory is bullshit. And yet they won't go away.

I was on an SSRI called Sertraline for over a decade, all while I was under the age of 19. I identified as "aroace" (asexual and incapable of love) from 12 to 18, and still have very little sensation in my genitals because of what Sertraline did to me. This post checks out. by CleverFoolOfEarth in CorruptScience

[–]HongKongPhooey 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

SSRI's are fucking poison. I was put on them along with adhd stimulants at 7 years old. This was in the early 90's when it was all the rage.

I do find that these drugs have a pronounced depressive effect on libido. Luckily I have not experienced that particular effect to that level of severity on zoloft, but I have had many other very unpleasant side effects as you can imagine.

I think the worst part about these drugs is how incredibly difficult they are to get off of, and as you say some of the side effects and withdrawal effects can last for months, years, or even seemingly become permanent.

I am currently in the process of tapering down my SSRI, and it is brutal. How long have you been completely off the sauce, and did you cold turkey or withdraw slowly? Curious about your experiences with getting off this poison after years of use.

Anyways man, thanks for posting about this, many people are seriously harmed by these things. I wish more people were aware of the potential harms of this class of drugs. They are not nearly as safe and consequence free as advertised.

I was on an SSRI called Sertraline for over a decade, all while I was under the age of 19. I identified as "aroace" (asexual and incapable of love) from 12 to 18, and still have very little sensation in my genitals because of what Sertraline did to me. This post checks out. by CleverFoolOfEarth in CorruptScience

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh shit man, I had no idea. I don't know anyone those drugs helped, but they sure fucked up a lot of us.

FDA & Pfizer Knew COVID Shot Caused Immunosuppression | Principia Scientific Intl. by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]EddieC 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whoops! The TOGETHER Trial actually showed that ivermectin worked. by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Quick; supress it before anyone finds out.

Whoops! The TOGETHER Trial actually showed that ivermectin worked. by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]yabbit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I tried it as a suppository and it worked great

Dr. Scott Atlas: A Powerful, Unelected ‘Cabal’ Controls Both Scientific Funding and Health Policy in America by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The site requires you to register. I did not test if it is paywalled.

The RNA code counted in Covid-PCR tests, belongs instead to a immune system response by human cells that liberate exosomes. So PCR tests give fake results as most already knew by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are different tests. The anti-body home-tests appear to work on any acid.
The PCR tests are used in the laboratories, laboratories that are often dirty and not even doing tests.

The RNA code counted in Covid-PCR tests, belongs instead to a immune system response by human cells that liberate exosomes. So PCR tests give fake results as most already knew by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]raven9 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I put Dr Pepper in a Covid test and it tested positive.

Scientific integrity is dead. Here's the proof - Steve Kirsch by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]Tiwaking 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The report’s lead author is Dr. James Gill, the chief medical examiner for the state of Connecticut and the 2021 President of the National Association of Medical Examiners.

Both boys died in their sleep less than a week after the second dose, and neither had any known health conditions prior to death. In these cases, autopsies of the two teenagers found evidence of myocarditis.

Myocarditis in children isnt just rare, it is practically impossible

Is science dead? - Steve Kirsh by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Science isn't dead. It just pissed off a lot of the stupid people in school and now they want revenge.

The WEF war on science by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok got ya.
This is unlike reddit or twitter where people call for the murder if it is in line with their politics.

The WEF war on science by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]Rob3122 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's my way of saying what I think should happen but also staying within the rules of the site. Perhaps I should've put a ;) after it.

My RealClear Markets Op-Ed On How Remdesivir Is Based on Junk Science - Pierre Kory by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If it's so bad then why is big pharma so butt hurt over it?

The WEF war on science by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Where do you get that idea?
Are you a bot or an NPC?

The WEF war on science by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]Rob3122 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Advocating violence is not allowed on Saidit .

The WEF war on science by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The politicians are too invested in the vaxx profits to give 2 shits about you.

The WEF war on science by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the real post! WEF is so out of control. It seems like it should be all anyone is talking about. It has corrupted national sovereignty in so many nations. How can you have a nation that operates in the interest of the public, when they're all controlled by the WEF?

FDA Executive Officer Exposes Close Ties Between Agency and Pharmaceutical Companies - Project Veritas by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They call it regulatory capture.

The problem of model lock-in by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But if you model too little, you also create false models. And this creates false ideas of reality. Or false ideas of a situation.

Like a climate model not including solar activity and clouds

The problem of model lock-in by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Modeling is so abused I stop reading a paper if it is based on/about/relying on a model for analysis. But you can crank up a computer (the big fancy ones still use cranks to start up, right?) and let it do the work, go get coffee with an attractive student and publish something quickly. I think p hacking in psych and over-reliance on modeling in the "hard" sciences are analogous.

The Reality behind Vaccine Efficacy Numbers (How to do magic with numbers) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In short. The vax is killing people (but they manipulate the data)

Independent analysis of the $cience:

If we look at the Pfizer trials we can already see how they manipulated the numbers: Deanna McLeod - Analysis of the Pfizer data and the real world data

The Pfizer data (from the study) shows that the damage is far more than the disease. In the field about 75% of people have side-effects, of which many severe. Yet, this is never reported due to the bad reporting system.

COVID Lab-Leak Whitewash Has Been 'The Death Of Science' Says Professor Who Found 'Unique Fingerprints' by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Feelings trump facts these days. It's as bad as the bible thumpers forcing religion over facts. If it weren't for bible thumpers we would have all kinds of stem cell cures for all kinds of shit right now.

COVID Lab-Leak Whitewash Has Been 'The Death Of Science' Says Professor Who Found 'Unique Fingerprints' by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. But I am glad people start noticing it in bits.

COVID Lab-Leak Whitewash Has Been 'The Death Of Science' Says Professor Who Found 'Unique Fingerprints' by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The death of science happened a long time ago in the medical field. Several other fields too.

COVID Lab-Leak Whitewash Has Been 'The Death Of Science' Says Professor Who Found 'Unique Fingerprints' by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

deep down everyone knows it and just accepts it now

360X increase in the rate of Lymphadenopathy (a disease of the lymph nodes) after "vaccination" by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

it's happening but msm doesn't mention it, you probably think it's fake news if someone anecdotally talks about it

360X increase in the rate of Lymphadenopathy (a disease of the lymph nodes) after "vaccination" by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yea? Well wake me up when millions of vaccinated people start dropping dead. Until then I wish people would just shut up about it. I'm tired of hearing it and not seeing it.

How the game is really played (Here is the "secret Fauci memo" explaining to everyone the Ground Rules of the pandemic) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wish he provided links to the evidence and explanations of the problems of the points he makes in the parody of a memo. I wish it instead of the parody memo actually, we know from reading Fauci's writing that his "artful" writing style would be entertaining in how it is clear and cryptic at the same time. The first point is especially important, I think, because the ADE problems that were present in animal trials of previous mRNA jab attempts and the predictions of an ADE catastrophe which is not off the table yet (especially in light of the lower-than reported jab rate).

360X increase in the rate of Lymphadenopathy (a disease of the lymph nodes) after "vaccination" by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

swollen lymph nodes can be caused by different things, if they get swollen but then go back to normal it is probably an infection that goes away

360X increase in the rate of Lymphadenopathy (a disease of the lymph nodes) after "vaccination" by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is this what my mum means when she says "my glands are up"?

A Myth is Born: How CDC, FDA, and Media Wove a Web of Ivermectin Lies That Outlives The Truth by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The moment Trump mentioned the drug it became taboo just to fuck with him.

Forcing People Into COVID Vaccines Ignores Important Scientific Data by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Forcing people into COVID vaccines can be very hazardous to your health when you knock on their door.

How bad data quality can turn a simulation into a dissimulation that shapes the future [DoctorsForEthics] by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]chadwickofwv 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For a perfect example take a look at climate "Science". Over a 50 year streak of failed predictions without a single success.

Forcing People Into COVID Vaccines Ignores Important Scientific Data by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Government does not care about science as a method of inquiry, they only see it as a way to justify their authoritarianism. Forcing people into anything ignores human dignity and freedoms we are all born with.

How bad data quality can turn a simulation into a dissimulation that shapes the future [DoctorsForEthics] by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]IkeConn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Retired IT guy here. It is called "GIGO". Garbage in, garbage out. If your data is bad your output is bad.

RFK, Jr. Tells The New American: Fauci Has ‘Dark History’ That Must Be Exposed by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Besides Mr. Kennedy's remarks, I would like to cite Fraudci's arrogance, that makes nearly anyone seem modest by comparison. He has a small man's ego and personality although most small men get over the problem or never have it Fraudci has an ugly af gnome complex. He is just a bureaucrat and a proven liar. He lied about AIDS to help big pharna get US $8,000 a year from most so called AIDS patients by selling AZT alone. It is the most toxic "medicine" ever foisted on the sick. This time, he must be punished with extreme prejudice.

RFK, Jr. Tells The New American: Fauci Has ‘Dark History’ That Must Be Exposed by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Here is piece of that interview;

Newman: Who is the real Anthony Fauci, and why should we be concerned? He’s not a friendly public health expert that we see on TV? Kennedy: “Anthony Fauci is the architect of agency capture within the public health agencies. He has orchestrated the transformation of HHS [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] from a public health agency to an incubator for pharmaceutical products and a promoter of the Big Pharma agenda.

He’s the J. Edgar Hoover of public health. He’s managed to stay for 50 years in office, I show in my book, not by actually accomplishing any measurable successes in public health — public health has declined dramatically under his regime — but rather by serving the interests of pharmaceutical companies — by helping make this country the most pharmaceutical dependent nation in the world.

We take three times more pharmaceutical drugs than the average in other western nations. We pay the highest prices for those drugs, and we have by far the worst health outcomes in the entire developed world. We’re 79th in the world in terms of our total health outcomes.

This generation of children that has come of age during Tony Fauci’s regime — since 1984 — is the sickest generation in history.
When he came into NIH [National Institutes of Health] chronic disease rates [in our children] in our country were around 6%. Today they’re 54%.
By chronic disease, I mean, not just obesity, but neurodevelopmental diseases like ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, narcolepsy, Tourette’s syndrome, autism. Autism has gone from one in every 10,000 people in my generation — which it still is today — to one in every 34 kids in my children’s generation.

During Tony Fauci’s administration, food allergies appeared in 1989. Peanut allergies, celiac diseases, wheat allergies, all these other food allergies, then autoimmune diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, lupus became epidemic.
These were all diseases that were basically unknown in the 1960s, and the science traces them to innovations that Tony Fauci controlled.
You can’t completely blame Tony Fauci — one person — with this cascade, this tsunami of chronic disease.

Tony Fauci’s job at NIAID [National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases] is to research the sources of these chronic diseases and immune diseases and allergic diseases and then help us eliminate them — identify the causes.
We know it’s an environmental toxin, it has to be. Genes don’t cause epidemics.

What I show in the book is, [is that] rather than doing that research, he spends virtually his entire $7.7 billion budget developing new drugs for pharmaceutical companies and doing bioweapons research for the Pentagon and for the military-industrial complex.
$1.6 billion a year of his budget goes to essentially weapons development — bioweapons research.

He’s the highest-paid individual in the federal government. He receives $434,000 a year — that is $34,000 more than the president of the United States. He has many, many other sources of income along with that job.
Sixty-eight percent of that budget comes from his management of bio-weapons research, and that’s why he was forced to do the gain-of-function studies in Wuhan and to manage them in Wuhan, because the Pentagon is paying him to do that kind of research and if he [doesn’t] he would lose the bulk of his salary.

Newman: So where does Bill Gates fit into this picture? He’s the friendly guy with the sweater vest, and he’s just giving away billions to improve public health, and yet your book suggests that there is a darker side to all this as well.
Kennedy: Gates summoned Anthony Fauci to his $87 million mansion on the banks of Lake Washington in Seattle in the year 2000 and proposed a partnership between the two that would eventually mandate a barrage of different vaccinations by 2020 to every man, woman and child on the earth.
They re-christened their effort in 2009, the “Decade of Vaccines.” They promised that by 2020, children — everybody on earth would be vaccinated — not just by one vaccine, but a whole host of vaccines.
Gates is heavily invested in virtually all the companies that make all of these vaccines.
He uses his philanthropy — he calls it philanthrocapitalism because it’s not really philanthropy.

He takes $33 billion and shields it from taxes, so we’re actually paying for his policies.
Then he has used that money to capture control of the global public health policy. He basically owns the WHO [World Health Organization].
He’s created a series of quasi-governmental organizations that dictate global health policy GAVI, CIFI and other ones that he’s heavily invested in and controls like the Brighton Collaboration.

He uses his control of those agencies to require developing nations — Africa, Asia, Latin America — to mandate vaccines to their populations. Those countries, for example African countries, are heavily dependent on WHO for the money that supports their health ministries and that supports their HIV [acquired immunodeficiency syndrome] programs.

What Gates and the WHO do is tell those countries, you have to have a certain amount of uptake for Gates’ polio vaccines, for his DTP vaccines.
Double your impact! When you make a donation to Children's Health Defense, your donation will be matched — up to $1 million! Donate Now!
If, for example, 70 or 80% of your population does not get those vaccines, you will not get your health ministry money.
The vaccines that they’re buying are vaccines that are made by companies in which he is personally invested and the Gates Foundation is personally invested.
When independent organizations, like the Danish government, have actually looked into whether or not those vaccines are saving lives — which Gates claims — they found that just the opposite is true.

For example, the most popular vaccine in the world, the DTP vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis), which Gates had promoted in Africa and Asia for many, many years as life-saving, tens of millions of children.
When the Danish government financed a study in 2017 — the Danish government plus the Statens Serum Institut in Denmark, and another vaccine company — financed a study, they looked at thirty years of records in Africa, to see how children were doing — who had gotten the vaccine compared to children who didn’t.
What they found was that girls who got that vaccine — while they were protected against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis — were dying at ten times the rate of unvaccinated girls.
The vaccine was protecting them against certain strains of certain infectious diseases, but it had obliterated their immune systems and made them extremely susceptible to minor infections and particularly to respiratory infections. Malnutrition, anemia, malaria — the other things that kill many African children, it turns out they were much less able — the vaccinated children — were much less able to fend off diseases than children whose immune systems had not been tampered with.

Newman: That is absolutely terrifying.

Kennedy: Let me add one other thing. Gates has basically transformed WHO from the development and hygiene and sanitation and economic development agency that it used to be, to an agency that basically does vaccinations.

Fifty percent of WHO’s budget goes to Gates’ vanity project, which is the polio vaccine, which most of the vaccine experts in the world — very pro-vaccine — told him from the beginning — this is not going to work.
You are not going to eradicate polio.

And today WHO admits that 70% of polio cases in the world today are caused by Gates’ vaccine.
Instead of obliterating the disease, it’s actually aggravating the problem. It’s causing epidemics in countries where polio had been eradicated, like the Congo and Afghanistan and many, many other countries.

Newman: That was even reported by the Associated Press based on WHO data. I saw it as well back in November of 2019.
So all of this begs the question, are these people doing this deliberately?
Are they evil maniacs? Or is this just well-intentioned, dumb policy, and what do you think their ultimate agenda is? Just to make money? What’s their plan?

Kennedy: That’s not a mystery to me. The same motives have incentivized people since the beginning of time, which is [to] accumulated power. Power over public health and the promotion of biosecurity have basically now supplanted all the other objectives of foreign policy.
It was deliberate. It was purposeful. It was promoted by these two men — by Gates and Fauci — but they had many, many allies.
As I show in my book, the intelligence agencies are deeply allied with Dr. Fauci and with Bill Gates.

They promoted a series of — the CIA actually promoted a series of simulations beginning in 2000 involving hundreds of thousands of people, and Gates and Fauci took part in these.
They were always promoted by the intelligence agencies and also by the military and the big pharmaceutical companies.
This [is a] very, very sinister alignment which I document in the book.

By the way, there are 2,200 footnotes in the book. Every sentence that I have, every factual statement, is carefully, carefully documented.
Anybody can look them up”.

The WHO Is an Institution of Corruption - Global Research by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]x0x7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Most organizations are institutions of corruption.

CDC Changed Definition of “Vaccine” and “Vaccination” Because Their Experimental COVID Shots Didn’t Work by [deleted] in CorruptScience

[–]thomastheglassexpert 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lying to me using different words does not change the lie.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

your act

Great example.

Yes, the flu that's being faked in every single country except North Korea, and that's specifically designed to to create the fake strain on all the medical professionals who you personally know.

Good try though. You have skills in reddit rhetoric.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The CoVID hoax?

The one in which every country except North Korea has faked strain on the medical system, especially intubation in intensive care?

And have faked even more strain on medical professionals, since of who I personally know?

Every single country?

Is that the hoax I'd have to be low IQ to Venice in?

Astrid Stuckelberger | WHO Corruption by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

In this interview in front of the WHO headquarters, whistleblower Astrid Stuckelberger details irregularities, conflict of interest and corruption within the WHO. She has a long resume (10 pages) in global public health, worked for WHO teaching the International Health Regulations to member states for 3 years and taught at Geneva University. She also takes us on a drive through Geneva where she shows us the various UN agency buildings.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And by "cognitively incompetent" you mean not buying into a grand conspiracy theories with no evidence?

By "cognitively incompetent", I mean your act where you pretend to be so normie-tier and low-IQ that you believe in the covid hoax, and the mountains of blatant lies and contradictions the perps are spewing to push it.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's all sealioning banter bait.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I've gone back and look, and there's none.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is there some well evidenced point I'm avoiding?

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

'12 scamers make 65% of the anti-vax misinformation on social media'

That's true. I link the paper. Read it. It's well researched.

The biggest killer by far of police in the line of duty is COVID-19. Vaccines would have saved most of those 250 deaths this year so far, and some of the later of the 248 deaths last year.

That's also true. I link to the data from the police death in the line of duty reports. Read them.

Is bad math. The ratio of population has the same effect of black on white crime as it does on white on black crime.

That's true too. A small population of one group affects the crimes committed by them and the crimes perpetrated on them by the same ratio.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe you know what he's talking about. (if anything)

Which vaccine is poisonous and what is the poison?

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can you point me to an instance?

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

say what dumb dumb?

"My profits trump your facts." doesn't quite hold because you don't have facts either.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And spreading misinfo to new or rare readers.

true, but WE are the disinformation agents! 2 certain members have the numbers to prove that!

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

LOL. There's a lot of weird people out there, many sad and angry - or embracing their existence, for better or worse.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

but thats all theyre good for.

And spreading misinfo to new or rare readers.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]mahavishnunj 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It would be easier if there was "your facts" to stand against my profits. But they are obscured too, initially.

say what dumb dumb?

Science eventually corrects itself. Probably not in time for the current generation. But it is the best we have.

this person is for real with this shit i think!

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

if not getting paid it is much sadder, I guess I'm an optimist at heart.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]mahavishnunj 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Or is there some well evidenced point you claim I'm avoiding?

yeah, THATS never happened!

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]mahavishnunj 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Okay, I'm going in. Which vaccine is poisonous and what is the poison? For fucks sake. I've got 20 cents that you refuse to answer that.

this is the shit that keeps me coming back here. if youre real, youre comedy gold.

Spreading lies about coronavirus

im telling you-you suck at this. whatever company you work for, HIRE ME. i could do way better than this.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]mahavishnunj 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I defy you to find a single SaidIt comment from you that contains information and isn't a lie.

is this one just too easy to fuck with? lol

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]mahavishnunj 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I defy you to find a single lie from me on SaidIt.

pretty easy to do with you though:

'12 scamers make 65% of the anti-vax misinformation on social media'

wow, that took 5 seconds, lets do 1 minute more:

The biggest killer by far of police in the line of duty is COVID-19. Vaccines would have saved most of those 250 deaths this year so far, and some of the later of the 248 deaths last year.

whoah, didnt even get 5 more seconds in. lets go further:

Is bad math. The ratio of population has the same effect of black on white crime as it does on white on black crime.

that was ONE MINUTE of looking through your hilarious bullshit. before i get 'give me your numbers', im laughing at you like the rest of us. if you are real, man. sorry.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We don't know if they are paid shills, but why else would they bother other than profound mental health issues.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]mahavishnunj 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I know it's difficult for you, but just try to think

you are talking to either a)a paid poster or b)a fucking idiot. its kinda fun interacting with them, but thats all theyre good for.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I have seen you shilling for big pharma several times. As to if you are a shill or a fool, I'll reserve judgment for now.

one or the other, or both. but i like seeing their posts.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

these paid shills want to rile you up, don't fall for it

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]mahavishnunj 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

choose which forum you would like to get owned in for the 1000th time. even though we all know you are a paid poster, its still fun watching yall squirm.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Actually, not.

We've all shown you. You refuse to see.

Go back and look.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If that were true, you'd be able to say what this evidence is.

You can't because you're a lying glavset shill.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Falsehood proceeds from Maine to Georgia, while truth is pulling on his boots.
      ~ Fisher Ames (1831)

A lie will gallop halfway round the world before the truth has time to pull its breeches on.
      ~ Cordell Hull (1948)

~ https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Cordell_Hull

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

with no evidence

You are a blind man insisting that colours don't exist - except you just have to open your eyes.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds like it.

You may have only heard a fraction of it. There's too much to catch up on and share. Some of it would only be interesting or entertaining if conveyed well, and some of it could be helpful and informative. And I'm still not sure if it's over or just beginning. I think I'll need to make the Winter work for my projects now.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds like it. Nice beard, btw. Mine is more like 7 mm, but the 'stache is about the same. New since last year. Am thinking maybe a more pliable wax might work for the day to day. Both I have now have to be melted to use.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

u/ActuallyNot has repeatedly demonstrated he's too intelligent and knowledgeable to be as cognitively incompetent as he pretends to be.

And by "cognitively incompetent" you mean not buying into a grand conspiracy theories with no evidence?

Or is there some well evidenced point you claim I'm avoiding?

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]Node 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

u/ActuallyNot has repeatedly demonstrated he's too intelligent and knowledgeable to be as cognitively incompetent as he pretends to be. Unfortunately, we're not all as intelligent, and many have trouble deducing (or apprehending?) the intent and bigger picture behind skillfully presented disinformation.

In their shill centers, and maybe even for the casual app users, replies = benefits. If they can't get marks to reply, they're the 'underpeople' of shilldom. Few replies gets them pennies each, but if they can hit certain levels, that = up to thousands of $ per month. Not sure if that applies to tiny sites like saidit, but it is definitely a thing on places like faceberg and that birdnoise site.

But the main issue, imo, is that a lie repeated enough will gain traction, despite being ludicrous or completely debunked. It also kind of poisons the atmosphere, and repels the less dedicated debaters.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're sealioning and wouldn't believe me anyway.

Ha! I win 20c!

You don't even know what vaccine or poison you're talking about!

Do your own research, lazy fuck.

And by "research" you obviously mean research. Going out and buying some samples of the vaccine that you won't say what it is, and do a qualitative analysis in the university lab for some poison that you don't know what it is?

You wouldn't mean reading your glavset propaganda on a public forum. Because we both know that's not fucking research. Dumb fuck.

No more today.

Yeah. A shill can only refuse to justify one baseless lie a day. Otherwise more people might wise up to the pattern.