you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The video explains how they made the viruses visible. Feel free to criticize that.

But your reply shows that you are stuck in some dogma.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Sure, the way they "make the virus visible" is by poisoning and otherwise attacking the cell, which CREATES AN EXOSOME which is MADE TO WARN other cells of the nature of the attack it is subject to. Easy. They used to use Phenol Red which is a cellular poison, but obviously they used some other poison to color the exosomes. Because green, not red. Same difference though.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You made a far better argument.

But that is not how they do it in the video. They use a tracker that is visible under the microscope, that is planted in the virus itself.
The virus can be tracked traveling from cell to cell, via micro-tubules and one can see them start replicating processes.

The processes that you describe do not seem to appear in this video. Exosomes are ways of the cell to expose of garbage and toxins.
And sometimes there are spike-proteins and mRNA in those exosomes as well, so I can imagine the confusion.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again, from the article I linked:

Perhaps the primary evidence that the pathogenic viral theory is problematic is that no published scientific paper has ever shown that particles fulfilling the definition of viruses have been directly isolated and purified from any tissues or bodily fluids of any sick human or animal. Using the commonly accepted definition of “isolation”, which is the separation of one thing from all other things, there is general agreement that this has never been done in the history of virology.