It might matter but you are right as why it appears it shouldn't. For me, how many of their unvaxxed are what anyone else would call vaxxed matters. Do the actually unvaxxed and relatively healthy fair better than both the fully and partially vaxxed? I suspect so, but that's it: I suspect, more out of mistrust than an interpretation of data I have not seen.

And it still matters to study outcomes without thinking about vax as the primary area of study. We know Ivermectin works, and Hydroxy-ain'ttryingtospelltherestrightnow works, and at least one other safe drug works. We know plenty of nutrients work well: N-A-C, Vit D, Vit + vit K, vit c, vit a, L-Lysine has anti-viral properties, Quercetin, Tumeric (and really any anti-inflammatory), and not being overweight is key. Can we see honest assessments (because 1 or 3 studies done by people with all the same ties and funding doth not a "the science" make) of how these nutrients and these factors impact outcomes and then layer over that the various states of vax compliance? The various states of vaxx compliance are also glossed over by the general public if not the corporate scientists.

There are 4 categories of vax compliance for the pfizer lab rats humans: none, 1 and done, 2 but drew the line at boosters, the human pincushion. Then there's J&J which I think is still one and done, and moderna I have no idea. So "vaxxed" vs unvaxxed even on their own terms is meaningless, unless they break it all down, and we're into a lot of categories if they did.

I think the biggest factor in being healthy is nutrition, stress, exercise, sleep, cleanliness, environment (which includes clean clothes, clean enough house, and protection from weather and I might include humidifiers in this not to be a pansy but because how the flu spreads easier in winter has something to do with a loss in the air's ability to hold moisture, maybe a humidifier makes that worse by being an artificial fix adding water but not heat), not jabs. But, that's a lot to account for and puts the drug companies on the outside looking in on discussions of health-- the same way something similar would put pimps and whores on the outside looking in on discussions of chastity.