all 5 comments

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

The trouble is if covid were causing the cases of myocarditis we would have seen a big rise in cases during the first wave.

However that's not what happened. Cases of myocarditis only started going up after vaccinations began.

It's all very well pulling numbers from lab results but you need to look at the real world results too.

[–]BossBrick 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

well this user is your typical sheeple doomer

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don’t believe you. ☄️

[–]BossBrick 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

typical stupid doomer propaganda

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

5 cases per 100,000 vaccinations adds up quick though, when you vaccinate the whole world on purpose. Is it not an additional risk on top of your natural risk? Yes it's lower than COVID, but not everyone will get COVID, but at least 1/2 of the population got the vax.

This "much bigger risk" assumes you will catch old school Delta covid, and therefore it is a smart gamble to get jabbed. Right?

The highest incidence of myocarditis after vaccination with mRNA vaccines has occurred within three to four days after the second vaccination in males who are under age 30.

Not very reassuring. It is showing a causal relationship. It is showing more vaxes worse health outcomes.

Furthermore, no one is saying that getting vaxed now will prevent additional myocarditis if you catch breakthrough covid later. This is all built on the myth that the vax prevents infection.*