Trusting the Science - The Science Showed The Presense of IgG Antibodies to the Spike Protein in Infected SARS Patients Caused Fatal Acute Lung Injury. Hmmmm

submitted by raven9 from self.Coronavirus

Did you ever wonder why big pharma chose to use the spike protein as their target for antibody creation?

This is an excerpt from research into the original SARS-CoV virus that was published the year before the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic was announced.

In SARS-CoV/macaque models, we determined that anti–spike IgG (S-IgG), in productively infected lungs, causes severe ALI by skewing inflammation-resolving response. Alveolar macrophages underwent functional polarization in acutely infected macaques, demonstrating simultaneously both proinflammatory and wound-healing characteristics. The presence of S-IgG prior to viral clearance, however, abrogated wound-healing responses and promoted MCP1 and IL-8 production and proinflammatory monocyte/macrophage recruitment and accumulation. Critically, patients who eventually died of SARS (hereafter referred to as deceased patients) displayed similarly accumulated pulmonary proinflammatory, absence of wound-healing macrophages, and faster neutralizing antibody responses.

  • Severe ALI means severe Acute Lung Injury.

  • S-IgG means Antibodies specific to the virus Spike Protein .

So basically what that text means is, the presence of S-IgG Spike Protein antibodies not only increased the damaging inflammatory response to the SARS-CoV infection, it also prevented the wound healing response that should have been repairing that damage to the lungs that was caused by that inflammatory response.

S-IgG antibodies specific to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein just happen to be the ones that are created by the mRNA vaccines. So if the vaccine induced S-IgG antibodies have a similar effect to the original SARS virus S-IgG antibodies, we might think vaccinated people could be in extremely dangerous position if they were subsequently exposed to the real virus. Are we supposed to believe Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen did not know this when they created vaccines that flood the recipient with S-IgG antibodies?

Everyone is seeing the massive number of the so called omicron infections but no one considers the reason for that is the vaccine induced S-IgG antibodies are enhancing it's effects in people that would have been asymptomatic had they not been vaxxed.

https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/123158

all 2 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]StillLessons 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You noted in another thread that nobody had commented on this when you posted it.

I agree with you. I'm surprised. I think the problem is that the paper is technical enough to drive most away. But you are absolutely right. It looks like from a scientific point of view, this paper may at some point play the role of "smoking gun" that creating a vaccine targeted specifically to produce spike-specific antibodies in the body of the recipient was indeed known beforehand to be pathogenic. This could be huge. If people ever come out of their stupor enough to begin to be suspicious that none of this was "accidental", this paper may play a very key role.

What a mess. Thanks for posting this.

[–]raven9[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thankyou for reading it. I am so glad you see my point. There is actually more to my theory than I mentioned in this post. Dr Chankra Chetty treated thousands of Covid19 patients in S.Africa. He noted that the people who recovered before day 8 never presented the severe symptoms like shortness of breath but anyone who was still symptomatic on day 8 always took a turn for the worst. They quickly developed the severe respiratory symptoms associated with Covid19. Dr Chetty posted his 8th day therapy but I don't think he realized at the time, day 8 is the first day IgG antibodies are detectable.

https://8days.org/the-protocol