all 2 comments

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That lost look on his face as the question comes out would mean more to me if there were any consequences for the years not of lies and bullshit about this weak-ass virus they concocted in a lab with DOD money.

Anyone have a link to the Oxford study he mentions?

[–]Noam_Chomsky[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if there were any consequences for the years not of lies and bullshit about this weak-ass virus they concocted in a lab with DOD money.

I think this whyrus is a PsyOp.

Having looked into the prevailing germ theory in contrast to the evident terrain theory (terrain??? -worst theory title ever).

Terrain theory wins. -No contest.

Theories must match real world phenomena.

One person in a married couple gets "Covid". They sleep in the same bed for 3 nights, and finally the healthy spouse takes the ill one to the hospital.
The hospital treats the ill patient as if radioactive and emitting death incarnate. Shield the spouse from the danger of the ill one, and quarantine the sick person.

This charade happens in in spite of the fact that they sleep in the same bed, and drove to the hospital and shoulder carried the ill member.

Something is causing the ill patient to get sick (no doubt), but it isn't an invisible and unisolateable super bug (that has all of the regular flu/pneumonia symptoms).

"Science" should investigate the actual root cause.
I bet it doesn't make any money.

The super bug is a dud, because "super bugs" are easily resisted by healthy people with a decent diet.
Antibiotics for the rare exception.

The notion of viruses emerged later.
Probably conjured up out of PsyOp desperation, because antibiotics are typically effective.

They played the long con on this one.