Where Will You Draw The Line? ~ Ben Garrison

submitted by JasonCarswell from grrrgraphics.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]rdh2121 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Oh boy! More misinformation and fearmongering clogging up a subreddit that could be used for, y'know, actual useful information.

Personally, I draw the line at science deniers and conspiracy theories, but that seems to just be me.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Wrongthink! Thought crimes! Shun the nonbeliever!

[–]rdh2121 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Literally no one said any of that. This is Saidit, and nobody can silence you here.

But, I think adding "victim complex" to misinformation and fearmongering sounds appropriate.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Got any more dumb labels? "Science denier"... Did you know the majority of studies published in scientific journals aren't reproducible?

[–]rdh2121 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah, "science denier" sounds pretty appropriate as well, now that you mention it. Add that to the list.

... Did you know the majority of studies published in scientific journals aren't reproducible?

Yes. Did you know that a) determining which studies aren't reproducible is a good thing, and entirely appropriate for rigorous scientific inquiry1 and b) that doesn't mean all of the numerous studies overwhelmingly showing the efficacy of masks and vaccinations specifically are among the unreproducible studies?

Got any more dumb non sequiturs to continue your attempts to distract and misinform?

1 You know what kinds of claims are never reproducible, because they have no basis in the scientific method? The misinformation, pathological science, and conspiracy theories this sub is constantly being spammed with. Remember that the first sign of a conspiracy theory is always having a ready answer for any and all criticism of your ideas.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

"science denier" sounds pretty appropriate as well, now that you mention it. Add that to the list.

I was quoting you, Einstein

a) no shit b) you missed my point

Remember that the first sign of a conspiracy theory is always having a ready answer for any and all criticism of your ideas

That's retarded. Go back to plebbit, fedora fag.

[–]rdh2121 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Now now, let's have proper discourse. None of this dragging down the Pyramid of Debate with ad hominem just because your argument is bad and you have no other recourse. That's what Saidit is designed to avoid, remember? Be better, /u/tseug.

[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The sections he quoted from you, do not hold merit. You can't ask people to adhere to the pyramid of debate, when you yourself seem to lack understanding of it. You are simply using it as a debate tool to push back against criticism.

"Remember that the first sign of a conspiracy theory is always having a ready answer for any and all criticism of your ideas"

That's not a rule of thumb. It is not worthy of being remembered. It is a lie. There is no truth in that sentence what so ever.