A doctor has run 22 miles to work and back wearing a mask to help stop the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories around face coverings and to raise funds for charity. He recorded that oxygen levels never fell below 98% of what it would usually be.

submitted by rdh2121 from newsweek.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Now do the same thing on a tread mill where you are stationary. Manual labor jobs have people standing in a single location, without air circulation.

[–]rdh2121[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Why? You'll just move the goalposts again when literally nothing happens.

Remember that the first sign of a conspiracy theory is having an answer for everything, and never being satisfied with proven data. Non-falsifiability is exactly what makes most conspiracy theories, like those doubting the literal mountains of data supporting the safety and efficacy of masks, unscientific.

[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

What fucking goal posts? I already know the results because the manual labor I was speaking of was myself! I can't breath at work! Now shut the fuck up with your accusations!

[–]rdh2121[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I can't breath at work!

And yet here you are. Seems like you can "breath" at work, otherwise you'd be dead. Now shut the fuck up with your stupidity.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

"And yet here you are. Seems like you can "breath" at work, otherwise you'd be dead. Now shut the fuck up with your stupidity."

Wow! I cant argue against that logic! Nobody can. Because one can not argue against someone so profoundly stupid as you are sir. Good show! I concede to you!

[–]rdh2121[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I mean, you still haven't put together an actual argument yet, so...

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You're right, I didn't put up an argument at all. Which leaves me asking what the fuck are you doing?

[–]rdh2121[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Continuing to counter your attempts to distract and disinform. :D

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Stop editing shit in. Nobody mentioned any theories, or conspiracies.

Now here is what was edited in in case you change it again:

"Remember that the first sign of a conspiracy theory is having an answer for everything, and never being satisfied with proven data. Non-falsifiability is exactly what makes most conspiracy theories, like those doubting the literal mountains of data supporting the safety and efficacy of masks, unscientific."

[–]rdh2121[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So disingenuous. You are entirely aware that this sub is constantly being filled with anti-mask propaganda and conspiracy theories, and your entirely anecdotal, baseless challenges to actual data are clearly nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to continue to discredit good science.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Good science is open-science - everything else is blind faith.

Open-science means not censored.

Why are they censoring alternative ideas and solutions?

That's not good science.