"SO IT'S A HOAX?" WHITE HOUSE FOX NEWS HOT MIC CLAIMS FATALITY RATE IS "1/10TH" OF WHAT REPORTED!

submitted by Tom_Bombadil from youtu.be

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Yeah and then the test of the homeless camp of 400 people, where 200 tested positive and literally zero of them were showing results.

I'm starting to think there is a massive problem with the reliability of the RNA-matching tests they've been using. I even heard a story the other day that one person took 4 tests and 2 were negative and 2 were positive.

So either:

1. The tests give way too many false positives, and almost no one actually has it, and it doesn't spread nearly as easily as everyone thought, because the tests were giving tons of false positives.

or

2. The disease is asymptomatic in the overwhelming majority of people, and everyone already had it over the last 3-4 months.

The new antibody tests that are coming out should give more reliable results. And I think that is what is causing a lot of people to now realize the death rate is actually around 0.1%, not 3-4% like everyone has thought. I am seeing a lot of things over the last 2 days that are confirming this much lower rate, including this hot-mic video and the homeless camp testing I mentioned.

Which means, if the rate really is 0.1% instead of 3%, then it's equally as bad as the flu, but not any worse. Which, if true, means the shutdown was completely unnecessary.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

All hail SCIENTISM !

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Or all "positives" are false positives and this entire event has been a PsyOp.

There's absolutely no way to develop and mass produce a test method for a new and specific strain of a virus in 2 months (January 2020- March 2020). It happened at the speed of Hollywood.

It's impossible.

The religion of sciencism of the world has fooled the masses.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

All hail SCIENTISM !

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Many studies on Pubmed say that the PCR test should not be used for diagnostic purposes but for research ONLY. There is plenty of cross-reaction and false positives. Once you understand it that they underplayed chronic bacterial infections in the 90's through today, creating organizations around symptoms where their CEO's obtain tens of millions, then it makes sense that they will do everything possible to slowly bring up the number of cases until a fraudulent vaccine is found in which they use their fraudulent diagnostic test to manipulate the efficacy of the vaccine. Profit. There's no profit in chronic spirochetal infections if vaccines cannot work, so it is best to underreport cases of spirochetosis and lie about if a patient died from Borreliosis induced heart block, whereas the opposite is true with Corona Virus. Just say they died from the virus if they have an antibody against it.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Corona Virus is immune-compromising. An antibody test won't work great and should be for surveillance purposes only. Just look at who is behind these tests and if they manipulate them in anyway.