WTF happened in 1971?

submitted by magnora7 from wtfhappenedin1971.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Now you're just trying to manufacture smears against others by complaining to the admins, after you yourself go around calling others names? Not a great look.

[–]beermeem 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I'm not the one who this looks bad on.

[–]Jesus 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

SOmeone, not me, wrote gays. I followed it up with something to substantiate his fragment. I was simply illustrating that gays ARE NOT the cause for all the woes seen in those graphs.

It is true that gay people consume a lot. Get your mind out of the gutter. They are heavy consumers and buy at a greater frequency than heterosexuals in the lwoer middle class.

At least I'm not calling people liberal faggots like you are.

[–]DffrntDrmmr 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

If there is no victim, is there a crime?

I was/am in no way offended. In fact, I found it funny and assumed it was meant that way. Regardless, it's not personal and sometimes we just release our thoughts uncensored, politically-correct or not.

Also, otherwise, I've noticed very insightful and informed comments by him.

"Though I may disagree with what you say, I will defend to the death your right to say 'liberal faggot.'"

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The point is, there are rules here, and like YouTube abd other things, they are incorproated. Hence, they can screw you anyway they please through their terms of service. If you disagree, then you want communism and the erasure of private property.

So, that being said, Saidit's rules are to follow the pyramid of debate, so it doesn't turn into something like Voat.

[–]DffrntDrmmr 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I understand.

It should be noted, too, that right after that post he followed it up with a substantive comment that fit the "pyramid of debate," without any response from me yet.

I still think this is much ado about nothing.