Global Warming aka Climate Change is Population Reduction, Not Science

submitted by hennaojisan from (bitchute.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fred_red_beans 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Interesting talk

40,000 new nuclear reactors in the next 50 years to power 13 billion at the same consumption per capita worldwide as the current US population's use (paraphase)

100 billion carrying capacity on the earth according to LaRouce. Sounds like a lot of people...

[–]hennaojisan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good point. Why do we need that many people? An exercise in fertility? LaRouce was a big mystery. I posted it but do I understand it? No.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I doubt the 100 billion was literal.

National parks would be crowed...