Just because I don't visit the site every day, means that I concede the argument? Since when?

I found Saidit via Fosstodon, FYI. If you look at my post history, you'll see that that's not a lie I came up with on the spot. You'd also know that if you asked, instead of immediately accusing.

I "parrot the MSM consensus" on 95% of meaningful topics that I post on, because there's not much where my interests (stuff I've researched) coincide with what's being posted. Just because the mainstream media's saying something, doesn't make it false, so there's no surprise there.

Let's hear some example of MSM ideas you don't support.

Happy to, if you tell me the attitudes of "the MSM" about stuff. I don't often follow the mainstream media, by the way, so I don't know what "their" attitudes are. From what I can tell from my limited observations, there's very little common ground between organisations; don't know the state of the press in America.

Please include links to your posts

I don't have the time to do that. Given that you said 95%, not 100%, though, it seems that you think that 1 in 20 of my posts are against the MSM, by whatever definition of "mainsteam media" you're using. That means that you've already acknowledged that I disagree with the MSM, and so I don't need to prove it to you.

If you like, though, you can perform the time-consuming job of trawling through my comment history analysing each view I've provided, and comparing it against what you perceive to be "the MSM consensus" in order to determine whether or not I agree with this seemingly-arbitrary metric. I will not.