all 3 comments

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

"You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. And yet I'm one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!

She recognised that she's one of the lucky ones, and that others are suffering worse, including dying.

How come you didn't know that? Did you not listen to her speech?

Here's a transcript. If you read it you'll know what she said, and your (attempted) refutations will come across as less childish.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Her childhood was never stolen, but she clearly had a depression from the scare propaganda.
Instead of helping the 3rd world with non-destructive projects, we are just removing resources from these countries.
And stealing their water and food too.

The "green projects" are destructive too. For example: they need Lithium and Cobalt for batteries.
We export our garbage into their countries. And setup industry that is cheaper there due to lower income,
lower safety standards and less freedom.
Some old forests are being destroyed for wood for burning in energy generators.
In the mean time the industry has moved to China and India.

The general problem is that we are exporting the destructive projects to other countries, to make it seem that the rich countries are doing well.

From her depression she is blaming people for doing work here, trying to have a normal life.
Instead she should blame the politicians, companies and military for exporting the destruction of nature to the poor countries.
And those are exactly the people that want to push for CO2 restrictions to create an energy dictatorship.

So in reality she is working with the enemy of humanity.
And the picture is a simplified way of showing that.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

but she clearly had a depression from the scare propaganda.

Oh, you don't think climate change is a thing?

It's not rocket science. We could go through it if you like. Basically, if you increase the atmospheric content of greenhouse gasses, you increase the greenhouse effect.

So in reality she is working with the enemy of humanity.

Nope. She's advocating sufficient action on climate change. That, if it takes, will save billions of lives and improve the lives of those that live.

And the picture is a simplified way of showing that.

Looks like the anti-science propaganda that the fossil fuel industry, Putin and Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud pay for. Anti-evidence based environmentalism, using ad hominem.