all 29 comments

[–]Zapped 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Straw-man argument. It's not about molestation at the drag shows where children attend.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's not about molestation at the drag shows where children attend.

The point is that its the churches who have done the grooming, and are deep into the molestation.

Molestation by transsexuals is nearly unheard of.

[–]Zapped 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Churches don't groom children. The molestation/grooming within them comes from people who mask themselves to use the church for their evil deeds. Drag is for adult sexual entertainment. The act of dressing in drag at children attended events is a form grooming. This can be drag queen story time or gay-pride events. I would be against stripper story time or letting children attend BDSM parades, too.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Churches don't groom children.

They set up an environment where a man has moral authority over children. That grooms them.

The molestation/grooming within them comes from people who mask themselves to use the church for their evil deeds.

Their power to do that derives from the structure of the church where one man is considered to be closer to god by the children who attend.

Drag is for adult sexual entertainment.

Drag is any entertainment where people dress up and perform, often in highly stylized ways. The term originated as British theater slang in the 19th century and was used to describe women’s clothing worn by men.

It doesn't have to be sexual.

The act of dressing in drag at children attended events is a form grooming.

No, that's something put out by Christians to deflect from the child abuse from predators that the churches attract and empower.

I would be against stripper story time or letting children attend BDSM parades, too.

So would I. But there's lots of drag that is not sexual. For instance DQSH.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Yeah no shit, nobody is having sex with children in libraries and bars with their parents watching.

Drag shows are for grooming.

Be smarter, OP

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

Yeah no shit, nobody is having sex with children in libraries and bars with their parents watching.

"Having sex with children" is called raping children. The perpetrators are in the churches.

They're not transvestites or transsexuals.

Drag shows are for grooming.

Church youth groups are for grooming.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

username

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

Google News, "Pastor Arrested" Child ~5000 results.

Google News, "Drag queen arrested" child 5 results at time of posting. (2 of them about MTG)

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Are you actually like high-funcitoning autistic, or a bot? Because you're clearly not getting my initial point.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

The original point is that Rampant child sexual abuse is occurring in churches — not at drag shows.

Your claim that "Yeah no shit, nobody is having sex with children in libraries and bars with their parents watching." doesn't hold water either. Drag queens are not abusing children after "grooming them": The perpetrators there too are pastors.

As can be shown by the thousands of articles Pastors arrested for child sex abuse or pornography, and the single one about a drag queen. (Ironically titled "Yet Another Drag Queen Arrested For Child Sexual Abuse Images", demonstrating bias that the churches have managed to squeeze into the issue to obfuscate the reality.)

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

It's like comparing shooting deaths between underwater basket-weaving classes and at gun ranges. No shit, you have fewer shootings at underwater basket-weaving classes. The post is a useless comparison. Do better.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

We agree on the point you're making here:

Gun ranges to shooting deaths is like churches to child sexual exploitation. It's an environment with increased risk.

And underwater basket-weaving classes to shooting deaths is like drag queen story hour to child sexual exploitation. They're not related, the environment is both usual and not set up in a way that it could happen.

So be skeptical of people trying to drum up fear of underwater basket-weaving classes. They're distracting you from the actual issue. Probably on purpose.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

The abuse of children by (non-catholic) clergy is so rare as to be non-existent as a statistic, so repurpose your own last paragraph ;)

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

The abuse of children by (non-catholic) clergy is so rare as to be non-existent as a statistic, so repurpose your own last paragraph ;)

Alas, you're mistaken about that:

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've been thinking this to be the case for a while now.

Interesting to see the MSM hitting the same point.