all 16 comments

[–]bbbarbican 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You said it. This is the kind of take I want to read. I'm so fucking tired of being expected to feel sorry for these pathetic women and having to invest time and energy to listen to their cries and their regrets. Why on earth would any woman consent to this eroticized abuse? But they do. Nobody put a gun to their head (obviously it's different if someone is a minor). So I don't give a fuck. And I so agree about heterosexual women being incapable of independence. Not that lesbian relationships can't sometimes be toxic but not to this extent. Like, no fucking close. This is why I don't care about MeToo: women are all 'let's listen to women and the abuse they face' but they are NEVER prepared to reach the logical conclusion which is to stay away from men. Nope, they still choose men over and over. And then cry when men behave horribly or complain that their husbands are lazy fucks. Like, what did you expect?? I'm not gonna give you a hug and tell you you are blameless in this. Miss me with that shit.

[–]kt0998[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

It's not even about giving up men, these women literally choose the shittiest men available because they think psychopaths are "hot alpha males" lol. Just having better taste and judgement would be a huge improvement, because although all men are shitty there are different level to male shittiness. It's obvious that most straight women PREFER men who treat them like dirt. They SEEK OUT that bad treatment. They actually find a man who treats them well boring. Almost every straight woman like this BDSM crap and always as the submissive partner.... how can anyone deny that this is biology?

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

They actually find a man who treats them well boring.

This has always baffled me. Het women intentionally seek out shitty dudes who will treat them as objects/madonnas/whores. And god forbid a guy even thinks to treat them well, thats an immediate turn off. Literally. Its pathetic that most het women have to be degraded to find pleasure. And the libfems saying degradation is empowering are off their rockers. Being forced into misery is understandable but choosing misery is pathetic beyond description.

Almost every straight woman like this BDSM crap and always as the submissive partner.... how can anyone deny that this is biology?

It definitely isn't socialisation because the feminist sexual liberation gave women the choice to be free. And most ended up choosing to give up that freedom to be either a madonna or a whore. Either a right wing women who finds pleasure serving hubby or a left winger who finds pleasure being a sex object. In short, freedom showed the true biological nature of the majority of men and women: doms and subs respectively.

Freedom for most het women made them realise they want to be be chained to men and family. And thus, forever remain the oppressed class.

[–]pizza- 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Right now I'm getting a bunch of women on titkok that decided to write to some prisoners, start dating them, and make videos how they are totally innocent and not really murderers, and get angry at anyone trying to tell them it's a bad idea. They show off their pictures and talk about how hot they are. Literally picking criminals now, cause that's better than some skinny fat boring guy. Of course other women are encouraging more girls to write to criminals, they're just hoping to find hot boyfriends in jail now. I don't even know what to say anymore when I see this level of stupidity from women. Can't get any more alpha than a murderer I guess.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

When I read about this scandal, the first thing I saw was the allegation of Armie Hammer being a cannibal. Being bored and nosy, I combed through the released texts between him and his “kittens” (the girls he was with; he called them ‘kittens’, they called him ‘daddy’).

He detailed his fantasies of cannibalism, as well as fantasies of murdering women, having sex with their corpses, keeping parts and organs of their bodies, using blood as lube for anal, getting turned on by scaring women, etc. Social media was more focused on the bizarre cannibalistic kink, but there was also a lot of, “don’t kinkshame!!!” and “Armie Hammer isn’t a REAL dom because he abuses women and BDSM is never abusive!!!”

Anyways, in my rambling, I’m trying to say that I kind of agree with you. I still feel slightly sorry for those women because I do believe he scared the shit out of them, but at the same time, I’m tired of seeing women make dumb, degrading decisions and not take responsibility. Apparently, one woman decided to meet up with Hammer at a park while he was walking with his young daughter. She had no issues having sex with a guy while he was looking after his child, and he had no issues with using his child as an excuse to meet up with his mistress (I think he was still married at that time, but I'm too lazy to check).

This whole situation exemplified the ultimate worst qualities of men and women. Armie Hammer is the exemplary terrible man: predatory, domineering, selfish, and violent. The submissive mistresses were the exemplary terrible women: foolish, spineless, weak-willed, and easy prey.

Oh, one last thing I found interesting: there was an interview Hammer did with Playboy a couple of years ago where he talked about how he enjoyed rough sex, but stopped having rough sex once he got married to his wife. He claimed it was because he “respected” his wife too much. The Madonna/Whore dichotomy will never go away, no matter how many sex-positive liberal feminists and sex-critical radical feminists alike fight against it. I believe the vast majority of straight men, if they could, would live this sort of life: keeping a Madonna wife to produce and raise their children and to upkeep their "good guy" image, while keeping a harem of “whores” for rough, unbridled sex.

Ngl, I think women are safer and better off being prudes—or at least, being really, really selective about which men they have sex with. Straight men never see sex as a negative because it’s not dangerous for them. Obviously, the better option is to separate form men completely or as much as possible, but that’s never going to happen on a large scale. Instead, the more reachable goal for the average straight woman is to be choosy as hell when finding a mate, but even that’s not gonna happen. Advising women, “Hey, maybe you shouldn’t be fucking around with men who are bad news” is too hurtful and mean lol. Telling women to be cautious, safe, dignified, and to take responsibility for their poor choices is a big no-no nowadays.

This was a long comment, my bad, but this is the only place where I can speak freely on such topics.

[–]pizza- 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yeah I have no sympathy for these women, and I hate how feminists expect women to provide support/give their emotional energy to this bullshit. I'm not going to waste any energy caring about a bunch or rich or famous women, models, actors or musicians crying about their problems. They fuck these dudes to get famous, and then cry rape to get more attention. They claim to be so stupid they can't tell a good man from a bad one and are constantly being manipulated, gaslighted, taken advantage of over and over again, like the "high value" women over on female dating strategy, who somehow manage to have 10 abusive bf's and never spot the red flags, and just stay in their idiotic hug box, convincing each other there is no way they could have known a guy is bad news. If they really are this fucking stupid then maybe their dad really should be choosing a husband for them. A lot of women just don't want to take any responsibility for their actions, and when you call them out on it they will cry about victim blaming, learn nothing, and do it all over again.

[–]kt0998[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Perfectly put.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Seriously, I'm starting to think that submissive hetero women are not capable of independence,

Damn. This is what I am coming to believe too.

[–]tallowcandle 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't hate these idiots because I don't think they are in particular more stupid or immoral than the ones who have "one night stands" or FDS ring-hunters, for example. Most het woman are addicted to cock approval, they don't even fucking get orgasms. Most het women already think that a man's gonna change for better for them nd project treir non-degeneracy onto men. Or that there are good XYs and they know a magic spell to detect one. Or that male sexual sadism is something XYs will do with them, not to them, if they say yes. His wife also stayed for years with a degenerate XY endangering herself with stupid delusions, she was just lucky he wanted a good public face, no way he or his vamiric XY-donors never slipped up. And she'll still remarry in a couple of years to a different elite XY vampire and bring her daughter right to him.

Celibates are the only hets who get a claim to be considered smarter than other hets.

[–]lurkergirl 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Mod absence has destroyed this sub. Are you gonna make a new one?

[–]kt0998[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I made new one and posted a link. https://www.saidit.net/s/bpf

[–]lurkergirl 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Based