Glad to find this Sub!

submitted by [deleted] from self.BlackPillFeminism

I am a blackpilled feminist who was feeling so lost among the wave of liberal feminist bs out there. Male dominance and female submission are mostly biology. I don't understand why people can't understand this. Look at the animal kingdom or even most higher mammals, the pattern is evident. I went from a liberal feminist to a radical to finally a blackpilled one. Well, its been quite a journey bit acceptance of the unfairness of nature relieved me a lot. Anyway, glad to find blackpill feminism on Saidit. I hope the sub is active here.

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]_Moon_ 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Totally agree.

You cannot understand the current (and historical) states of the world without taking the biological blackpill about men AND WOMEN(!) into consideration.

Men have evolved to rape and kill, and the ability to hurt and dominate women is - at the end of the day - more important for them than, say, having access to universal healthcare, education without massive debt, jobs that aren't exploitative and where you aren't overworked and underpaid, affordable rent, etc. etc.

At the end of the day, being able to hurt and dominate women is more important for men than not being oppressed by men with higher status.

And if you do not take this into consideration, you cannot explain why a tiny minority (of "kings", "aristocracts", capitalists, tribal chiefs, etc.) ruling over a subjugated majority is the standard in all of history.

Men are face down ass up in the dust before high status men. And as long as they are able to hurt and dominate women, tehy are perfectly OK with being the serf of a high-status man - no matter if that's Elon Musk or some tribal stoneage chief.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Exactly! I am tired of the libfem rant of how patriarchy is dangerous to men more at the end of the day. No! Even the most low status male will have a female partner he can dominate and hurt. Or if not, physical strength gives men the upper hand in dominance. Its all so sad, how biology and evolution works. But I see no point in denying it.

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Based and black pilled

[–]UnapologeticMisandry 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I went from being an anti-feminist (I didn't know there was any kind of feminism besides Liberal Feminism, which I hated straight off because of its obvious logical inconsistencies and its even more obvious ingrained exploitation of the very people it claims to represent) to being a radfem, to being blackpilled. Antifems believe in biological determinism as a positive. They think that this is the way things are and that suffering is essentially a woman's place and it's good that way. Radfems think that suffering for women is social rather than from biology and we can all make it go away if we "educate" men into being human beings with empathy for us (LOL). Blackpillfems are the only based group. We acknowledge that women's domination and the depravity of males toward us is both biology AND an inescapable social evil rather than a positive. It's the only ideology that aligns with reality and sees women as human beings. I wish it were more mainstream... but the blackpill literally keeps the blackpill from being mainstream. Most women will never figure this out because they are programmed to want to breed with smegs to prolong the species.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You succinctly explained the three strains of feminism well here. I cant stand liberal bs. Now, I am coming to be irked by radfem claims as well. But as you said, I dont think blackpill is gonna be well accepted. Its sad but ppl are mostly programmed to breed and go with the flow. I am just happy for those who have come to realise the truth.