Bisexual resource. They even define bisexual as attraction to both sexes!

submitted by gloomy_bear from bi.org

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]MarkJefferson 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Nah, Fuck that site: https://twitter.com/BiDotOrg/status/1564802381799620608?t=NpIqr0KVQ_tt7lH3gOKFnA&s=19

And fuck them again for fucking with the definition of bisexuality: https://bi.org/en/101/bisexuality

And again for their stupid explanation of the shortened form of bisexual: https://bi.org/en/101/when-to-use-bi-vs-bisexual

[–]gloomy_bear[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Damn! I thought they were a good one! (;¬_¬)

[–]MarkJefferson 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm always afraid to dig too deep into these sites, in case I find something objectionable..

[–]PriestTheyCalledHim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Exactly. Even the Robyn Ochs stuff is boring and she did the exact same redefinition you wrote about.

[–]MarkJefferson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And why is it an "umbrella term"? You're either are or are not. This vague and unspecified bisexuality+ garbage dilutes the identity, and paves the way for posers and sidlers. It's like what Paula C. Rust talked about in her book. If you stubbornly refuse to define your own label to appear "openminded", "inclusive", and not offend the emotionally unstable, someone else(opportunists) will do it for you. And then everything they do or say can be sloughed onto you.