you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]exponent2 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

she's had arguments with me before. she's being dishonest about the multiple people who argued with her on multiple posts and she's too self centered to get it and she's here trying to "stir up drama" to pretend she has a mob to run back to. What she's saying is that gays/lesbians constantly complain and criticize her because they're "stuck" on gay. They cant escape their homosexual identity. It's permanent. So their community is based on civil rights and the humanization of same sex attraction. Job discrimination, civil rights, religious persecution. Look how she openly admits that when she says "these people...the more they value gay marriage, the more they criticize me! i dont know what it is but there must be some sort of evil correlation!" and then she goes on to dismiss their struggle for their humanity and to be recognized by the state. She most likely fully intends on getting married to a man in the future as most bisexual women do but just look at what she openly admits: "why do they care about this stuff?". I think you seriously need to police the people on this sub. She validates EVERYTHING gays and lesbians say about bisexual women and she comes on here to look for a toxic hug box to validate her. How are gays/lesbians "insecure" when she says she notices a "problem" of gays/lesbians being concerned with civil rights and her superficial identification and association with them and their priorities and concerns? And you never "had another option"...you were always for heterosexual supremacy and never saw gays as human until heterosexuals gave you permission to. So how about removing the toxicity from this sub to actually build that trust.

[–]clitoriana 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ngl bro this is incoherent and nonsensical to me. Who are you even talking to? Just go away lol

[–]exponent2 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

ya bro. thats why it has 4 upvotes and you could have responded to anything but decided to act like some rapper with your "wassup bruh" aesthetic to pretend your literacy issues somehow invalidates the comment. it doesnt. if you have trouble understanding something, ask for help.

[–]clitoriana 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

nah blocking you now bc i don't argue with delusional scrotes <3

[–]exponent2 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

oh look, a homophobic radical feminist with such great analytical skills as: "the asteroid coming to wipe out all life on earth is misogynistic because it's going to kill all women!" is "scrotes" your way of pretending you're not part of the patriarchy that committed genocide against gay males for about 2000 years and that straight men arent your best friends? lol "scrotes" yeah, great deflection. what names do you have for lesbians when they give her the exact same criticism?