you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HoppeanAncap 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

you were posting bad faith comments with no knowledge whatsoever of anarcho-capitalism, as indicated by your " I see it as neo-conservatives role-playing as anarchists to trick people", so he was justified in banning you. Please post better faith comments that follow your own rules next time.

[–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

They were not bad faith, and they were not lacking in knowledge. You cannot just delete anyone who disagrees with you by calling them anything you like, as you are currently trying to do.

[–]IdleHands 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Just like you can make a subjective judgement about what you consider "bad faith posts", other people can do the same.

Unless you argue that your preferences and interpretations are the only correct way (fundamentalism) you have to accept other points of view.

What you're doing is saying that the entire site should be ran according to your whims as long as you don't define "bad faith posts".

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's judged by the pyramid of debate

[–]IdleHands 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The picture doesn't judge anyone. It's a tool for the judge.