What should the limits be on sub moderators?
submitted 4 months ago * by magnora7 from (self.AskSaidIt)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]OmegaUser296 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 4 months ago (3 children)
Because if someone has say over 50 subs there is no way in heck their actually continuing to moderate each sub and sure as heck won't be able to give much individual attention to each sub.
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 months ago (2 children)
You're under the assumption that those are all high volume subs.
On SaidIt there have been more than 50 subs for a while and d3rr claimed he had read every single post and sub. I don't know if he still does that or not. When he speaks it usually matters. I don't think he's human. What I think doesn't matter.
Who are you to determine what "matters" anyway? How much individual attention is enough? Start quantifying and qualifying some stuff and I might start to take you seriously.
[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 months ago (1 child)
Okay please read my comment in which I pinged/mentioned you before you continue to be hostile please.
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 months ago (0 children)
I'm working my way through my messages using context. Apologies if my order of response is meh.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now