What should the limits be on sub moderators?

submitted by magnora7 from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Yeah an absolute limit on subs might not be a bad idea.

[–]Yhvr 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Maybe have no limit to modding some things, like CSS. But limits on others, like banning.

[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's an interesting idea too, I like that.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for that great idea.

To no one in particular:

I'm not interested in hoarding subs. I'm not interested in wielding power. I DEFY ANYONE to prove otherwise.

I like having subs to put things in. If there was a Justice or Law or Legal or Unfairness or RiggedSystems sub then I could post stuff there - regardless if I made it or not. I'm only making them where I see voids. Plus a few projects.

I wanna do design on the subs to make them custom and build a better community. If you think my designs suck you can tell me and I might take in your ideas and improve them. If everyone wants to vote on the aesthetics of SaidIt and ban all the banners and CSS, I'll vote for my choice but go along with what ever happens.

I have one more good day on my CSS before I can say they are all "done". I have already started by I'm also inviting people to co-mod. Many of the subs in "my list" are already shared by many others. The number of subs is not NEARLY as important as what you do with them.

Tell all those empty sub people to fuck off before anyone tells me how to live my life. I'm totally sick of whining slackers.

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I hope a limit get's added, I say 50 that way people can still moderate a lot of subs but not hoard them.

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly though they'll probably just create another username. But the hard limit is probably a good idea regardless.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Define what this evil "HOARDING" is and why it's only bad .

[–]OmegaUser296 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Because if someone has say over 50 subs there is no way in heck their actually continuing to moderate each sub and sure as heck won't be able to give much individual attention to each sub.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You're under the assumption that those are all high volume subs.

On SaidIt there have been more than 50 subs for a while and d3rr claimed he had read every single post and sub. I don't know if he still does that or not. When he speaks it usually matters. I don't think he's human. What I think doesn't matter.

Who are you to determine what "matters" anyway? How much individual attention is enough? Start quantifying and qualifying some stuff and I might start to take you seriously.

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Okay please read my comment in which I pinged/mentioned you before you continue to be hostile please.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm working my way through my messages using context. Apologies if my order of response is meh.