What should the limits be on sub moderators?

submitted by magnora7 from (self.AskSaidIt)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]happysmash27 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Alternative idea: Subs that break this rule are kept off the default front page.

I think the original idea seems good though; if it is not, for some reason, there can always be a later discussion about changing it.

[–]roc 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think that is too much like the Reddit solution of quarantining. It hides problems but doesn't solve echochambers.

[–]happysmash27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Great point!

[–]FormosaOolong 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's an interesting solution that could be quite effective.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Could be. Or it could just create a corner that turns into an echo chamber cesspool.

IMHO one of the best things about SaidIt is the minimizing of divisions.

[–]FormosaOolong 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

totally agree. there are plenty of outlets for people that want to spew.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To be more specific, I'm guessing you're talking about the rule: "No removal of good faith and on-topic posts/comments."

Others are also floating a "Limit number of subs rule."