Saidit, what if we showed who voted on everything?

submitted by magnora7 from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wizzwizz4 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I think you should instead have a "voting diversity" score, calculated with data from the last month, a "voting divergency" score, calculated by comparing behaviour from the past two months, and a "voting novelty" score for datums that don't fit in the "voting divergency" algorithm.

The delay should serve to restrict gaming of the system to people who can be bothered to look through the code.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

How would this voting diversity score work?

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

How many different people you vote for, divided by total number of votes, compared against the site's average (so 1 is the average). Most people would be slightly above 1, and the spammers would be lower down.

Although maybe the stat would only be visible to admins; anyone could compute it themselves if they wanted to. I'm not really sure how to stop people from gaming it whilst maintaining transparency.

[–]OldManCorley 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

How many different people you vote for, divided by total number of votes, compared against the site's average

Similar stuff have been tried, the way to circumvent it is to set an array of "related" subs (or manually select random posts) and have two out of three votes be driveby votes on random posts to fuzzy the "upvote diversity".

Its a tough challenge I still haven't seen a good solution to.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

We could add a daily post vote limit.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Fuck that.

I need endless votes.

I vote when it doesn't mean I voted for their idea.

For example, I voted for every single comment in the post.

Why?

To mark that I read it.

If anyone responds to my comments I'll be called back.

When there are any new comments I can easily spot and read them too.

ALSO

What do you do when you don't vote on a day because you barely visit or don't visit SaidIt, yet on another day you have all day on SaidIt but run out of votes?

QxR limits their votes/rewards. LAME.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's terrible! /u/magnora7 Please add a "read" mark to the feature requests list so JasonCarswell doesn't have to keep doing this.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree.

LOL. At first glance I thought my voting habit on long threads was a problem for you and you were trying to affect my votes, (as if you could), by tattling on me. Then I reread it. :P