Saidit, what if we showed who voted on everything?
submitted 5 years ago by magnora7 from (self.AskSaidIt)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Mnemonic 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun - 5 years ago (2 children)
I'm not sure... Might start discussions about someones vote too much and thereby generating comments that are 99% sure to be useless.
This would also give more power to votes given and less to ignored ones. I mean, did I ignore a posting or was I away for a day a 'missed' it?
Edit: I can see this starting people to use the fun vote to denigrate a posting (So you can show you 'disagree').
[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (1 child)
i agree, this could be exploited by users to start witchhunts and drive users off the platform and keep potential new users away when they see the shit flyin.
[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (0 children)
Not as long as the witchhunts are publicly held in an open forum. Too many of us are skeptics, including skeptics of the process and skeptics of witchhunts. If it's all transparent then reason should prevail and only fail if ignored.
There are boogie men and witches and G-men and Mossad out there up to no good and we need to be ready.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
Ask the community of saidit a question!
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Mnemonic 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)