you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MaiqTheTrue 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They’re simply pdeophiles who haven’t found a victim yet, and are actually working to undo the protections we have in place.

They outright reject in-patient treatment. They don’t want to have to report to police or be barred from jobs that give them unfettered unsupervised access to children. They don’t want to suppress their libido with drugs. Some want access to “safe” child porn. Basically they think that requiring a MAP to do anything but attend a meeting once a week is tyranny.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How long before they go after the word “minor“?

I’m surprised they don’t go after the whole concept of consent itself based on how many times it has been used throughout history to let white women get away with lying about Black and Jewish men so that they could be executed for crimes that were not even committed. Get rid of that, and then you are arguing over the age of nothing. And you have not only legalized pedophilia, but rape as well. Mission accomplished, and then some. And once they legalize pedophilia and rape, they will go after your pets and they will use the consumption of meat to justify it.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can you back any of your claims?

I would say they actually want protections for themselves, rather than undo protections that we have in place for children. At least the pedos who know children can't consent. Yes there are disgusting opportunistic maps who believe children can consent but I doubt that's the majority.

Why put yourself on a list of pedophiles when a vigilante would go after your head? Society doesn't accept that pedophile is a mental illness, not something you "acquire". It's just like homosexuality.