you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EternalSunset 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

If you aren't planning on abusing little kids then why would you need some kind of pedophile club looking to be accepted by society? Seems sketchy and highly suspect to me.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

MAP's argued they are marginalized... which in first hand sounds fair. I mean, you wouldn't want people to normalize child abuse right? But then again whenever someone is convicted of diddling a kid they're called a pedo, and pedos who are just minding their business are put on the same group. How do you want society to have these people seek mental help if they think their therapist will just turn on them and they will get raped in prison? In turn a bunch of pedos are just left to their own devices and more likely to diddle kids in the process.

At the same time I see the issue of grouping a bunch of pedophiles together... it could lead to "issues".

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Therapy doesn't help paedos, it just makes them more likely to offend.

Any kind of normalisation makes them more likely to offend.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Normalization of what? You think therapy goes "oh just go and abuse children"?

You know 1% of people are pedos? That's about 3 million pedos in america. What's your other suggestion to this problem besides... uhm "normalize pedophiles going to therapy"? You want pedos to just "hey pedos jump off a bridge!" who the hell wants to kill themselves?

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some people deserve to be marginalized for marginalizing others. Children’s bodies are just not big enough to handle adult sexual organs.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

This is how the trans mafia started 20 years ago. “We just want to be left alone!”

They’re just taking the costumes off now.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Trans mafia is a bit more intricate...

They followed off gay rights, whereas the gays left others alone, the TQ+ wants to indoctrinate children to normalize their lifestyle.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

My point is that they’re the same people. Trans was a means to an end.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't disaggre that MAP normalization could lead to the trans equivalent of today.

However I do think a lot of good people are behind it with the goal of reducing child endargement. I aggre with the notion that less marginalization of pedos could mean less pedos feeling shamed of getting help, thus making them way less likely to act on their urges.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You’re not picking up what I’m putting down. Guessing your either a bot or a lefty.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Anyone who disaggres with you is a bot or a lefty? I think you're the bot here...

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, not at all. Anyone who struggles to maintain a grasp of the conversation tends to be a bot or a lefty.