Who is the stupidest user on Saidit?

submitted by [deleted] from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (60 children)

Socks is often wrong, I think he is susceptible to liberal media propaganda, but I don't think he is stupid in the sense of lacking cognitive ability or having a low IQ

[–]BISH 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

but I don't think he is stupid in the sense of lacking cognitive ability or having a low IQ

Cause it's a shameless bot

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Cause it's a shameless bot

He's clearly not a bot, I have had many conversations with him in chat. He is just a liberal who believes what the liberal propagandists tell him, I have plenty of family members just like him

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]jet199 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Socks was definitely more than one person.

    He'd say something horrible to me then act all surprised the next day when I wouldn't converse with him and just called him an arsehole.

    [–]Zapped 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I've wondered if that happens with a couple of accounts here. It would explain why some accounts never get more than 2 hours of inactivity per day.

    [–]BISH 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    He's a bot. Nobody is that clueless and shameless. They'd leave in disgrace.

    But Socks comes back to shovel more shit.

    [–]Musky 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (36 children)

    He is not a drooling idiot, I agree, but any intelligence he has is rendered moot by his inability to recognize and be, at the very least, suspicious of bad information. He's not unlike Weegs in that regard, except Weegs has good days and Socks is always a shitlib.

    [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (35 children)

    Socks has a hard time overcoming his ideological bias to view information objectively, a problem many saidit users seem to have

    [–]Musky 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (31 children)

    I'm trying to think of another Saiditor who does what Socks does, and I'm coming up blank. Maybe the Qtards but they're all gone now I believe. You ever read Sock's links? They don't always support what he is saying, he doesn't read them. He doesn't read the links you send him either. He never seems to consider both sides to an issue, he just picks a CIA approved topic/source and runs with it.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

    I'm trying to think of another Saiditor who does what Socks does, and I'm coming up blank.

    I'd say ActuallyNot is on a similar level, and Site_Rly_Sux and Chipit are worse, they won't even pretend to engage with information

    Or even the conservitards like SMCAB

    https://saidit.net/s/NotTheOnion/comments/9z9b/drunk_university_of_kentucky_student_22_is/104yr

    I get these comments all the time from conservatives "it must be fake despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary because it disagrees with my confirmation bias"

    [–][deleted]  (11 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]BISH 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

      We've seen with the recent elections that the radical right have gone too far, that they've finallly gotten the attention of young voters.

      Found another bot.

      Edit: Could be elite sarcasm.

      [–][deleted]  (5 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]BISH 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

        Those are great details.

        Yet you disagree. You probably like to eat yellow snow.

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Let it be known that BISH shares great examples of being very smart and Swarzenigga eats yellow snow 😂

        [–]MightyMorphinFaggot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Apparently you are right wing xtreme if you use your eyeballs to look at things.

        [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        🤢

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

        So according to this logic, anyone who disagrees with the far right disinformation propaganda on Saidit is dumb?

        You are misunderstanding me. I wasn't suggesting those users were dumb, or connecting it to republicans vs democrats. I am suggesting that users who strongly conform to a particular ideology are particularly susceptible to confirmation bias

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Musky 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          You got Reddit Standard Basic Bitch Ideology loaded in your deck, nibba. Check yo self before you wreck yourself.

          [–]MightyMorphinFaggot 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          You're a government shill FOR FREE?

          lol

          [–]Musky 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          ActuallyNot is on a similar level, and Site_Rly_Sux

          I wasn't even thinking of the Sock's clones lol. They're the RC Cola to Sock's Tab.

          Chipit

          I dunno, his stuff hasn't been as pointlessly argumentative lately as it has in the past.

          SMCAB

          Drug brotherhood.

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

          While ActuallyNot eloquently avoids the subject matter through careful derailment, ChipIt pushes a subject ridonkulouly passionately with the temperament of a chihuahua with rabies, and Site_rly_sux becomes hostile towards opposing views reducing down to name-calling and childishness, each can well be incredibly frustrating to talk to at any length, but none of whom I'd consider in any way fall into the category of stupid. 🤷

          [–][deleted]  (3 children)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

            Except you. You are stupid.

            [–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

            ☹️

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

            I'm just messing with you 😄

            [–]SMCAB 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Man you gotta try harder, and I honestly thought you were smarter than this.

            My comments are riddled with dark humor and most are typed as clear joke fodder, as I don't take this place seriously, AT ALL.

            You don't even have to go that deep into my history to see you calling me a conservitard is lazy.

            If you paid attention at all, you'd know I'm purple, in the middle, and think two party politics is a sham. Just because the fake woke left keeps giving me golden material, doesn't mean I'm running around with my Reagan hat on. Wow brother. Do better.

            [–]BISH 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            You ever read Sock's links? They don't always support what he is saying, he doesn't read them. He doesn't read the links you send him either. He never seems to consider both sides to an issue, he just picks a CIA approved topic/source and runs with it.

            Like a bot.

            [–]JackBoot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            /u/ActuallyNot and /u/ShalomEveryone are not as prolific.

            [–]BISH 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            I'm trying to think of another Saiditor who does what Socks does, and I'm coming up blank.

            The person who figured out that socks was a shill, Is not a BISH.

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

            Maybe the Qtards but they're all gone now I believe.

            Isn't this just a blatant lie and mischaracterization? Aren't they kinda sorta just grooming people here every single day?

            [–]Musky 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

            Hurts my soul, man. Can we take a break from the Socratic method?

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

            Isn't it just a waste of my time to use Socratic dialogue on vapid shitstains like you?

            [–]Musky 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            🙄

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            😂

            [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            Omg, you called musky out

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Can you rephrase that statement to be more Socratic?

            [–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

            But guns are scary, socks has a right to be scared of your bombings in Ukraine

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Haven't I caught you pretty much doing the same thing? Couldn't we wish for a world where you applied the same standards to your own references and claims that you apply to others'?

            [–]JackBoot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            ^

            [–]JackBoot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

            That makes him more dangerous and more disinfo.

            [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

            Isn't JasonCarswell calling other users dangerous pretty much just peak irony?

            [–]Musky 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

            Even a broken clock is right twice a day, buddy.

            [–][deleted]  (11 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]Zapped 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

              My God! You're right.

              [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

              😂

              [–][deleted]  (2 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]Zapped 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                Hehe.

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                Who acts as though he wants to start a discussion, says all the wrong assumptions, and then resorts to name calling.

                You could describing yourself 😂

                [–]Musky 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

                Weird talking about yourself in the third person.

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

                Probably better to talk about himself than spout off more hateful tripe toward everyone else on the site.

                [–]Musky 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                I like dumping my hate on the internet so I don't internalize it.

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

                I just shout at the TV when I watch the news.

                [–]jet199 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

                That makes no sense.

                Unless you are literally on some kind of middle class white savour kick and have no interest in engaging with your fellow human beings.