Could we agree that anyone who voices support in conversation, debate or discussion in good faith without determent to the argument could be seen as not being a virtue signaller?

Therefore knowingly and/or willingly voicing what is typically bias arguments to disrupt a topic in bad faith, potentially in unprovoked self defence, with the only benefit being to be seen to voice said argument and irrationally so in favour of a single group with no regard for another's views, would be on the side of virtue signalling?