My process lemma

submitted by GeorgeCarlin from self.AskSaidIt

Everything in life regarding human nature that measurably is changeable by the human in question follows a simple three step process:

  1. At first it is a decision the human in question actively can make. He takes full responsibility if he actually decides. It stays ambivalent, if "too much" time passes regarding the context, if he doesn't make the decision. Sort of in a quantum state, so to say.

  2. It may or not become a decision to decide on or "rule" a result by another human or a group of humans than the human in question nonetheless has to take full responsibility for. Even a sequence of decisions made by other humans is possible to force a "result" and its consequences occiasionally happens. (Look at how a justice systems operates, e.g.)

  3. If neither case 1 or case 2 are apply-able or the decision isn't made in a "useful" time-frame regarding the context: It becomes a coin-flip in the most wide sense. An experiment with possible outcomes that are very hard to predict in some cases.

But in every case there will be a result somebody has to take the responsibility for. Most likely the human in question that decided to "not decide" for too long, so to say.

all 4 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Ever thought about just making lemmanaid?

[–]GeorgeCarlin[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It is lemon aid. For the lemon you bring to your hairdresser, so to say.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

But in every case there will be a result somebody has to take the responsibility for.

+95% of people default to either #2 or #3. For a variety of dependant variables.

  • Short term gain culture
  • Diffused accountability
  • Indirect consequence(s)
  • Propaganda media
  • "Education" authority system of brainwashing/standardization/dependence
  • Gaslighting critical thought/dissent

I suspect there's enough independent thinking quietly occurring. Exceeding critical mass.

There's an imminent global reality check on the horizon.

The enemies of humanity are making too many mistakes, and are now in a panic.

The spiritual forces of good aren't weak.
But they usually show up late to the party.

It's party time.

[–]GeorgeCarlin[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People have to wake up. I agree.

"Critical mass" is about 25% (deciding to stand up for themselves...).

I forgot where i read that, but i know that i read it somewhere.