you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Females are the default template and have a much easier time trying to become male than the other way around.

Then how do you explain the statistics? I'm not talking about the chromosome level, whether the embryo starts female or male. I'm talking about the genes expressed in the adult version of the phenotype, and how that affects body shape and features. Women and men used to be more similar to each other, and then humans deviated and women became more like children (also men, but more so women). So to go from more refined, delicate features of women to robust, larger features of men is harder.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don't see how. Almost every male goes from those refined, delicate features to the irritating robust, larger features. And females can transition to male, but neither can go back.

You probably think all the other things look more male because your instinct is that females are royalty and deserve special treatment. Therefore your brain is an expert at spotting them and detecting fakes, in an almost paranoid manner. Everything else is registered as male, including other species. This is probably why male is usually the default gender socially, not because people are misogynist, but to the contrary because they elevate females as special higher beings. This is because of male disposability, and this is a great example showing why nature is evil and shouldn't be trusted. All it cares about is might and who can reproduce the most. You are nothing but a cog in its system. It will torture you for all eternity for all it cares, the universe is indifferent to you, as long as it furthers the interests of natural selection. And yet everyone bows down to it. How can they support such a wrong system?

[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You probably think all the other things look more male because your instinct is that females are royalty and deserve special treatment.

No not really, but there is a distinction to be made between the average female, and the idealized version, which many aspire to present themselves as. That difference between reality and the presentation/idealization of their image, is I guess, sexual selection in action... the ones that can closer reach that ideal get more attention and over millions of years the ideal becomes reality. This is done in a much shorter timespan with dogs, and you can artificially select features and get that feature after a few generations.

Everything else is registered as male, including other species.

I'm mostly saying humans have sexually selected features for females (I thin k women played a role in it as well), much more than other species. It's another big difference between animals and humans, just like how humans have a prolonged childhood unlike any other animal.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Humans are cursed with insane sexual dimorphism as described in Genesis 3. Animals get it too but nowhere near as much (but still too much). And humans are also wired to select for features that will make it even worse. But females hold nearly all of the selective power, which is why males have to simp for them. I think it is the males who are getting farther away from normal. Males are shoehorned into a very specific biological purpose, which is to ensure the wellbeing of females and their success at reproduction. Female biology allows them to live actual lives, only expecting them to give birth, and luckily modern science has found ways to stop even that. But nothing can be done for males, whose entire being is rebuilt from the ground up on his expendable role. You may have heard of the famous incel line "men under 6' can't get a date". Now that's bogus but there is definitely truth to the idea that women have huge expectations for men. The reason is because they're tricked by instincts into being natural selection's agents, choosing the most "masculine" and sexually dimorphic partners (and even expecting men who aren't their mate to fulfill these obligations to them). But men are made desperate by their biology so they'll take anything they can get I guess.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Just wondering, do you think it would be better if God had designed men closer to the way he designed women, at least appearance-wise?

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, not for 99.4% of them. I am the exception. It would make things easier on them socially, but at the cost of having to live with gender dysphoria which is 5000x worse, believe me you don't want it.