all 10 comments

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Many of the most credible journalists seem to be on Substack these days. This isn't surprising seeing as all msm are propaganda machines owned by billionaire donors that buy off the politicians, and don't actually allow real independent journalism when it conflicts with a given special interest narrative

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Unfortunately no one has the money to produce real news broadcasts without any advertisers and all the major corporations have been bought up by (((blackrock))) and (((vanguard))). You can get some of the major stories from people like thedarkhorse podcast and Tim pool but they aren't out there doing investigative journalism.

[–]Evola 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Tim Pool cries wolf a bit too much for me. Sure I subscribe to him but all you need from him is the title of his videos to get the news.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, he fluffs every piece. I also don't make it through the whole video most of the time. He needs a good co host. That skateboard guy was a moron.

I would really like for him to take clips of other talking heads and news organizations talking about the same topic and just shred thier propaganda. It would be a much better way to make the segments longer.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Tigerdroppings.com

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

My intuition.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Social media seconds after the event happens, before the mods can delete all they don't like.

You must become proficient in screenshot first, read after.

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No one source, or small collection of sources, can be trusted. Only diligent work to seek additional points of view and information, from multiple sources, and verify cited source material, can come close to finding a credible narrative from the slurry of biased and weaponized propaganda that is our current news industry.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are no reliable sources of information, no media network not endorsed by political parties or paid for by big pharma, no social media platforms not infested with far-left loonies or censorship, no individuals recordings not distorted by lack of context or poor perspective. Trust no-one. Everybody lies.

[–]Evola 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably just whatever primary sources dumped on the Chan's where you can see unedited footage of an event or even better a live stream of an event as it's happening. It'll still have edited footage sure but there's less of chance of it.

Even better is just go outside yourself and do your own research. Travel across your own counties and see for yourself what they're turning into.