What I advise is for people to have "hit list" of those whom they consider both politically reprehensible and personally disgusting. Once the tide turns and lawlessness prevails, we must each immediately start killing and robbing those on our lists without further thought or question.

If we can all plan around this, mentally and logistically, so many questions of tactics and provisioning answer themselves. We don't need food stockpiles or a command structure, just white-hot hatred. That is in ample supply at present.

This is, on its surface, a non-ideological plan. I didn't say anything about Christ, or globalism, or Nazis, or "trans" rights. So, in spreading this notion of decentralized, viral, murderous resistance (and I have no doubt it will spread), how do I ensure that it engenders the creation of a better society post-crisis?

That's difficult, but not hopeless. Part of it is who you spread the word to, but that's not everything. It's not like the political right has ever really benefited from reading Saul Alinsky, for example. Why?

I conclude that Alinsky's tactics fit the leftists of his day like a glove, and, conversely, my distributed murder doctrine is inherently right-wing, reactionary, and conservative.

The left is naturally centralized. They are the establishment. They will be too busy desperately clinging to the status quo, putting on their uniforms and finishing up grad school, holding sham elections and running NGOs, to see our bullets coming at their heads- and then they'll quickly be too far down in Hell to cause any more trouble.

There are superficial similarities between Alinsky's suggestions and my own, but there's a profound difference. Alinsky, and leftists in general, are noisy. They want to grind you down with public scrutiny, interminable protests, etc.

My decentralized assassination doctrine is profoundly quiet, if we do it right. The only big part I'm still puzzling through is the identification of the inflection point.

Say you read this and make your list. Thousands of others have theirs. If you just go out and start killing people, you'll just be Beto O'Rourke's next hard-on.

So, it is probably important that the tide of death be synchronized in some way (which is, of course, antithetical to everything else written here). A nuclear attack, EMP incident, or the like would provide an answer, so I suppose we're all just waiting on that for now.

Go ahead and make those lists, though.