you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Entropick 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (36 children)

No formal statement from u / SUCKS, interesting.

[–]JasonCarswell 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (35 children)

/u/HenryGeorgeOfficial sounds a lot like /u/socks.
They both suck.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (28 children)

no one gives a fuck, Nazi

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (26 children)

no one gives a fuck, Nazi

Stay classy, corporate authoritarian shill.

I'm sure you can't even realize how hypocritically ironic it is that you are calling me the Nazi...

“Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of the state and corporate power.” -- Benito Mussolini

I bet HenryGeorge is your alt.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

you're trying too hard

[–]JasonCarswell 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (22 children)

You're thinking too little.
You also support the Ukranian Nazis, shill.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (16 children)

1) You can say I support whatever you want. It doesn't make your lies true.

2) BBC is corporate news. Corporate news is the enemy. You are shilling for the enemy.

socks is the ENEMY WITHIN.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

you obviously support war criminals

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (7 children)

Explain like I'm 5 how it's obvious.

[–]turtlew0rk 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

If you support either side you support war criminals.

[–]Heter0ph0be4Life 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Flagged for harassment and bullying.

[–]FediNetizen 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Coming back on saidit, and finding the holocaust denier accusing someone else of being a nazi supporter for being against the invasion of a country where 2% of the population votes for far-right parties is just too good.

[–]Heter0ph0be4Life 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Anything above 0% is grounds for an invasion.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then we need to have a discussion about Russia, because if you don't believe that at least 2% of the country holds far right views I have a bridge to sell you.

[–]Heter0ph0be4Life 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Flagged for harassment and bullying.

[–]Heter0ph0be4Life 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Flagged for harassment and bullying.

[–]Optimus85 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

And no one on this site gives two shits about you but you're still here...

[–]HenryGeorgeOfficial 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

At least we have brains and can understand statistics.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Are you sure about that? How would you know?

[–]HenryGeorgeOfficial 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You could start with displaying an understanding of the Simpson's paradox and how it applies to this thread.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Either you're referring to Homer Simpson and pork chops or correlating stats. Knowing about them doesn't mean you understand them, nor that you're correct.

[–]HenryGeorgeOfficial 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Except I do understand them. Here is a video from a career statistician explaining exactly how Simpson's paradox applies to this exact problem:

https://youtu.be/XVRfBhy5vGI

[–]Optimus85 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And I've blocked them both. I don't want to create an echo chamber but their gaslighting is blinding my eyes. Bye bye manure!