ShalomEveryone is a full of shit enemy of humanity, and I ask for them to be banned for perpetually sealioning, shilling, lying, and dragging down discussions (only the last is ban-worthy by site rules).

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (64 children)

Not "all"

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (63 children)

only paid shills pretending to like him

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (62 children)

So - the only people who would dare disagree with you must be paid to do so, because everyone would otherwise agree with you.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (61 children)

So - the only people who would dare disagree with you must be paid to do so, because everyone would otherwise agree with you.

Fallacious binary bullshit and you know it, asstroll.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (20 children)

Please leave "asstroll" off in the future. That's an example of name calling.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (19 children)

Tell him to stop being one. He's trolling my ass like he wants to fuck it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

I think the best possible solution is forcing your accounts to block each other, if that's technically feasible.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

You think wrong. The asstroll needs to be banned.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

If we all always agreed it'd be a boring echo chamber. What Socks thinks, which is obviously wrong, represents a whole lot of liberals out there. It is important that view is represented, no matter how personally distasteful you find it.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

You know that's not the problem.

It's the prolific dishonesty.

I never give a shit about rules, especially arbitrary subjective ones (PoD, "downward", etc), but because I respect SaidIt and this community, I aim to follow the rules - and thus I'll use the rules as weapons against the problems of SaidIt as they were designed and intended.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (39 children)

You too have the same problem of assuming that disagreement must be paid for. Come to think of it, it's been a while since you've asked Saidit to ban be. Go on then, more posts asking to ban people. Break more Saidit rules. Or, leave me alone.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (38 children)

You too have the same problem of assuming that disagreement must be paid for.

More simplistic inaccurate bullshit LIES from you.

Look back at the history and I usually if not always say that you're a shill, paid or not, intentionally or not.

Come to think of it, it's been a while since you've asked Saidit to ban be. Go on then, more posts asking to ban people. Break more Saidit rules. Or, leave me alone.

I only comment on your bullshit when I see it and care to bother. You can ban yourself without my help, asstroll.

Stay off my posts and you can better avoid me.

Meanwhile...

Go fuck yourself with a big pharma overdose. Or wake up. Your choice, authoritarian shill.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (37 children)

As usual, that's all you've got. Just insults. Reported for your repeated dragging down of the POD. I'm sure the mods will spring into action and look after the wellbeing of Saidit, or not. Again - leave me alone. Your constant bullying is part of the reason Saidit has so few users. Congrats.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (17 children)

leave me alone.

Then stop trolling on my post.

Go fuck yoursocks, selfish.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

You know my comments aren't trolling. You should also know of your impact on Saidit.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

You know my comments aren't trolling.

So now you're a mind reader and a liar?

You should also know of your impact on Saidit.

Obviously not enough to ban your bullshit.

Go fuck yourself - or better, smash your computer. Please.

[–]AXXA[A] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You do not get to decide who responds to your posts. If you want this level of censorship then create your own sub and take it off of /all . Then and only then will you be able to censor comments on your posts.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Duh.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

I'm sure the mods will spring into action

Consider me sprung. Personally I was thinking of asking u/d3rr if he could just override user blocking options so y'all can't see each other permanently.

[–]AXXA 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

/u/d3rr Is it possible to give admins a tool to force one account to block another account? Me and Musky used our mutual telepathy to arrive at this idea at the same time. I think this goes along with the idea /u/magnora7 had of a restraining order issued by a judge that separates parties. His comments about that are somewhere in this post. It would be a great alternative tool to use instead of completely banning accounts. It should still be okay for the users to remove their blocks after a cooling down period of 2 to 7 days.

Along these same lines, numerous people have stated that the reason they won't use the block feature is because it blocks entire discussions. Is it possible to tone down the block so that it only hides comments from the blocked user and not responses and whole discussions? The individual comments could either be hidden by showing as deleted or by spoilers.

Thank you.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

All of those asks together is 20 hours of work or more. I'm burned the fuck out after the docker port. Creating github issues for these things is a good next step though.

I don't know if I like the idea of admins forcing certain people to block other people. It's heavy duty parenting shit. Socks is a skilled troll and is beating Jason. Banning Jason (for 2 weeks or whatever liberal bullshit we do) is the easier solution.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Consider me sprung

LOL (if the pun is intended)

(I think Mr C would be sad if he couldn't see my genius posts. Also - we're a 'free speech' site, at least in name, so we're expected to have thick skins.)

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

we're a 'free speech' site

D3 has repeatedly said we are not. I understand the reasoning, there are certain realities.

I think Mr C would be sad

Both of you have been incredibly against simply blocking one another. You both obviously care greatly about each other.

so we're expected to have thick skins

You both start shit. I would not want Saidit deprived of either of you characters.

[–]AXXA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I actually had that exact same idea today.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Great minds think alike.