ShalomEveryone is a full of shit enemy of humanity, and I ask for them to be banned for perpetually sealioning, shilling, lying, and dragging down discussions (only the last is ban-worthy by site rules).

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]milkmender11 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

Nah we don't do that here. I like SE. Refreshing and undebiably dedicated troll methodology. Old school 4chan would be proud. Besides if you ban him, who the heck would even still be on this site. It's like him and four other people

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (10 children)

one of the reasons it's so dead is new people come and see so many trolls and spammers then leave

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

This. This is an infinitely underrated post. But Carswell's METHOD is godawful.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I'm open to improving.

I'd also point out that authoritarianism with "strong leaders" is worse than godawful, no matter how you spin it.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Depends on the leader.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Depends on the leader.

No. It doesn't.
They're all human.
They all must be Machiavellian to even become leader.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Your definition of human is lacking.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I didn't define it, so how would you know?

IMO, you should create /s/askanazi.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Inference. You hold that power corrupts. Yes, this is true, unless somebody has become fully incorruptible. There is an actual science of the mind that allows this, and its practicioners readily see the near-infinite advantages of such a state.

Therefore MOST people are corruptible and will remain so, but there are and will be growing numbers of fully incorruptible individuals. While these are EXCEEDINGLY rare today, there will be more. Soon. Give it a decade and there could be enough to head every single nation on Earth.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Inference ≠ definition.

There already are more than enough to lead all nations - many times over. But they will never be allowed to by the corrupt matrix of rigged systems of centralized power.

We need alternative FOTPACH systems.