It's obvious that the ShalomEveryone account is arguing in bad faith.

That's an incomplete sentence. The end of the sentence is, "who disagrees with him".

There was a post where someone mentioned white genocide. I said white genocide does not exist and I said the following...

saying that there is nothing to "White genocide"

That's because that is the case, there is no white genocide. During World War II, 10,000,000 people were systematically killed by the Nazis. People were kidnapped and shipped off to concentration camps to be killed. Where in the world right now are white people being kidnapped and sent to concentration camps to be killed?

The Khmer Rouge rounding up over 1,000,000 Cambodians to be slaughtered in the killing fields is genocide. Today, where are the white people rounded up and being massacred in killing fields? It's not happening today to white people.

King Leopold of Belgium killed 10,000,000 Congolese, that's genocide. Where are whites being killed in those numbers anywhere? I'll tell you where, in Fantasyland of white supremacists.

White supremacists like to point towards declining birthrates as "white genocide". That's not genocide, just because white women use birth control unlike women of other ethnic groups does not mean there is a genocide.

“White Genocide” is a term coined by white supremacists for propaganda purposes as shorthand for one of the most deeply held modern white supremacist convictions: that the white race is “dying” due to growing non-white populations and “forced assimilation,” all of which are deliberately engineered and controlled by a Jewish conspiracy to destroy the white race. This same conviction can be seen in the so-called “14 Words” slogan, the most popular white supremacist slogan around the globe: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.” White supremacists commonly claim that they must take action, even violent action, or the “white race” will “perish from the Earth.”

https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/8tlq/poll_reveals_shocking_number_of_dems_would/woro

My post alone received 3 insightful and 1 fun. If I was arguing in bad faith, saiditers would show that by clicking "fun". That's not the case though, there are more insightful which means I argued in good faith and more people agreed with me than disagreed.

Genocide is what happened to Jewish people, Congolese, Cambodians and Armenians. Whites are not being slaughtered.

I believe the discussion in that thread is what caused u/JasonCarswell to call for my banning. I hurt his feelings by saying there is no white genocide. I provided examples of true genocide by mentioning millions who were systematically killed. Nowhere did he say, "you're full of it, there is a white genocide, 2,000,000 white people were massacred in this country and that country".

What does Carswell do? Did he provide examples of millions of whites being systematically killed? No! Hell, did he provide examples of tens of thousands of whites being systematically killed? No, he went on about fauci and vaccines. He made sure to include the antisemitic echos in his post. Then he went on to say, "ShalomEveryone is a full of shit enemy of humanity."

He's calling for my banishment and here he is saying I am full of shit, that's low pyramid of debate material there. Also, saiditers agree with me more than Carswell. Take a look at his post, there are 2 insightful and 3 fun, meaning more people disliked his post than liked his. Saiditers liked my post more than they liked his.

Why would anyone defend it?

Because they like discussions with differing opinions? Because they may disagree with me but they know I back up what I say to the best of my ability?

Shalom

✡️