Overpopulation is real

submitted by rolledin from self.AskSaidIt

Ok so all the pollution and everything is from who then? I don't buy climate change but who is polluting so much? Animals suddenly got water bottles? Fucking retards made so many people we all have to live like poor people, bc only stupid people have tons of kids they can't support. So the question is, why is sterilizing people bad? They are too stupid to see the future....

all 47 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

CORPORATIONS destroy the Earth. Good job blaming Joe Average, dude. Think of all the massive environmental disasters by every type of corporation, and come back at me with "people shouldn't be allowed to have plastic bottles, they are stupid people and should be sterilized."

That is pure insanity. Just make regulations that any non-reusable plastic containers need to be made of biodegradable plastic. But noooooooo, let's let mines kill whole rivers with mercury, the lumber industry destroy vast ecosystems for wood, and the oil industry poison vast swaths of the ocean, that's fine though. But Evil Joe Average uses Saran Wrap on his Evil Sandwich and should get sterilized for it.

I am holding back a lot of expletives right now.

[–]Nullisect 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He is still right about overpopulation. If the whole world got rid of plastic and fossil fuels tomorrow, forests would fucking disappear because there are way too many people to support the old, sustainable way of living. That and billions of people would die.

Now there is an argument that that situation would be a good thing but in both cases, it shows that the world is currently overpopulated. Corporations destroy the earth currently because having hyper-efficiency obsessed corporations supplying us with fuel/food is the only way to sustain the level of population we have.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nope

[–]OrionBlastar 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

China and India are the top two polluters in the world. But everyone blames Europe and the USA even if we have programs to reduce pollution.

Elon Musk is right, move to a different planet, Earth is doomed.

[–]Tiwaking 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OrionBlastar 3 insightful - 1 fun - 19 minutes ago China and India are the top two polluters in the world. But everyone blames Europe and the USA even if we have programs to reduce pollution.

Greta Thunberg tried talking shit about New Zealand too - climate crises is about making scapegoats out of those who have little blame.

[–]Feldheld 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

This is exactly how Bill Gates and his 1% mates think.

"Ooh look at these stinking polluting peasants, we really need to get rid of them."

[–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Bill Gates is right.

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Wow a jew thinks everyone except people like him should be killed, never seen that before!

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Bill Gates isn't jewish.

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Talking about you lol

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

What Gates and I have in common is that, unlike you, we aren't moronic scum. The moronic scum have to go.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I disagree. When the dollar collapses, the global elite will lose most of their power over the rest of the world.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I mostly agree, but... Different elites have different motives. I believe that Gates is a sincere eugenicist. But most of them just want power. The covid tyranny is a means to power but it will most apply to the West. After the dollar collapse, the West will be a tyrannical block much like the Soviet Union was, but their power over the rest of the world will be limited because they will no longer be able to print unlimited money.

      [–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      sure thing kike

      [–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      another moron to block

      [–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      😎👍

      [–]Noam_Chomsky 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      So the question is, why is sterilizing people bad?

      Are you sterile, and loving life?

      [–]IkeConn 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

      Hello Captain Obvious. Now what can we do about it?

      [–]rolledin[S] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

      Well we need to show people that having 2 kids is better than 4 kids bc you have more time for them and money. The benefits of a quality kid, that can turn out great, vs 10 kids, that all live at home and beat off all day.

      [–]IkeConn 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

      Well bless your heart. You see one of the problems.

      [–]rolledin[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

      I see them all, sorry you have a issue and want me to compile them all at once bc you just don't get how it works, and why people think we should kill ourselves instead of other options.

      [–]IkeConn 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      You misunderstand. I see what you see. I'm not knocking you. We know what is wrong. We just don't have the power to fix it right now.

      [–]jet199 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      You can't fix other people's behaviour, that's the issue.

      Most people have the ability to raise a small family well if they want to. That's just not their priority.

      In fact you could say we have the other problem in the West. So many people are choosing not having kids we have to allow scumbags to have large families to make up the difference. Most countries in Europe would be going down in population without that policy.

      [–]Canbot 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

      The issue, as you pointed out, is that there are too many stupid people. The solution is to create a prognics system that increases intelligence across the board. Allow people to buy high quality embryos for artificial insemination. The vast majority of those low quality people will jump at the chance to have a beautiful and intelligent child birthed by them. Make it affordable and it will change the world within a generation.

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

      CEOs and their staff destroying the environment are STUPID people? No, they just don't care. They're sociopathic, but not stupid. Same thing with the "elites" and the guverments.

      [–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

      The places with the worst environments are 3rd world shitholes where people shit into the rivers they drink from, dump garbage everywhere and never clean anything. They are the places with the lowest IQ. The Detroit River is toxic because of the people who live there.

      Of course corporations cause damage on an industrial scale. They also produce goods on an industrial scale. Having regulations to minimize corporate damage is good. And it is something that already exists. The extent to which those regulations are subverted is another symptom of the low general IQ which allows the public to be controlled and bamboozled into allowing that corruption.

      Intelligent people FIX the environment. It is not a simple equation of more population = more environmental damage. Smart people can have a much higher population and not only not destroy the environment but make it better.

      Haiti is an absolute wasteland because it is populated by low IQ Haitians. It would become a tropical paradise if it were populated by high IQ Haitians. Despite the fact that those high IQ Haitians would create all those corporations you hate. Even with increased consumption, and increased production, and factories and politicians it would be a paradise. While the factory free, low consumption hati of today is an absolute wasteland.

      TL;DR The solution is in fact to raise IQs

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Point conceded, but I've given up on that. I don't see how it could happen.

      [–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Why? It is certainly a lot more likely than getting rid of CEOs and politicians.

      [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Yep, in Thailand they have little shrines outside every house for the earth spirits and gods.

      Everyday they put a plastic bottle of water and a plastic bottle of milk on this shrine with a plastic straw, because god needs a straw for some reason.

      Then everyday yesterday's goes in the bin, or elsewhere, because God needs the best fresh stuff.

      Millions of families doing this.

      Then down on the coast the Thai people are like "Why is so much plastic waste washing up on our beaches, we must be just unlucky with the currents."

      [–]EddieC 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Replace the Corporate-driven "Worker-Consumer" mindset with a Stewardship mindset

      with income for a different kind of work - Life Enhancing Research Work

      to improve the Health of Our Body, Planet & Society

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–]AXXA[A] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        /u/jykylsin2034 Please don't advocate violence.

        [–]BravoVictor 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        why is sterilizing people bad? They are too stupid to see the future....

        Sounds like we have a volunteer! You sure fit the bill.

        [–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        ALL big problems are political in nature and could be resolved by the corporatocracy along with proper ethical social engineering - if they wanted to solve them.

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

        This might not be intuitive, but resources are not finite. Since Malthus we are told the same story about how we are going to deplete resources and die, and we always find that we discover more resources through science and technology and the population increases. The siren song doesn't change, even after the parasite class's chicken little routine fails every few decades

        They expect us peons to be mathematically ignorant by showing us graphs of exponential growth, when in reality logistic growth is more realistic. If we honestly couldn't afford more people we wouldn't have more children. That is, if there really was a limit to resources, we would not be able to have more children.

        Pollution is bad, but sterilizing and killing people is worse, because there is no natural right to have a stress-free life. Besides, most of the pollution is because undeveloped countries are having an industrial revolution. Much of the poverty is because of the distribution of wealth and not the growth of the population. Perhaps we should redistribute Rothschild wealth?

        What the parasites mean by too many people is that there are too many slaves to control who honestly believe that they have ownership of wealth that rightfully belongs to the parasites. Hence they are working towards a future where we own nothing and are happy.

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

        yeah if the population gets too big they'd overthrow the rothschilds, this is why they did the crusades, to get young men out of their countries and to go die fighting arabs. This is the reason for most wars.

        [–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        I didn't know you believed in the patriarchy.

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        I do, wish we had one

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        I don’t know about the Crusades or if the Rothchilds had that much power then, but since the latter half of the twentieth century they’ve been hypnotizing the masses to fear basically existing on the planet. The more people there are, the more people who will escape their cradle to grave propaganda system. To the libertarians, communists are the source of all evil. To the communists, free markets are the source of all evil.

        The parasite class, wealthy individuals running corporations, provided the funding for the communists in Russia. They hide behind “communists will enslave us all” but they also support wokeness and communitarianism for the serfs and their carbon sins. Thinking in terms of left and right confuses the issue. They hide behind both sides of political ideologies they create. Nothing wrong with redistributing trillionaire’s wealth because if you don’t they’ll form monopolies and ogliarchies and eat up any free market as well.

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        back in the crusades they all had the symbol of a red cross on a white shield, the rosy cross, this was rothschild's aka red shield's doing even back then, they have been in charge for a long time.

        Yeah the more people there are, actual literal billions, the better the chances are of one or a few of these humans being really smart and able to lead a rebellion. The less people there are, the lower the chances of this. Just the law of averages.

        [–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        It's probably the opposite. The more people there are, the more power and control they have. Kind of like today. The technology only enhances that power and makes it even more efficient. Anyone remotely capable of leading a rebellion is probably already on the "potential rebel leader" list if they partake in modern society.

        Fewer people means a lower power level, and less ability to act or monitor.

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Hm, and here I thought they were culling the gullible...

        [–]ETR 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Overpopulation is a thing in cities because people constantly move into them - not out.

        [–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        I'll just point out there's a new male contraceptive being trialed at the moment so that's why this idea is being pushed now.

        https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6648279/Scientists-invent-cocktail-inspired-male-contraceptive-injection-block-sperm.html?ito=native_share_article-top

        [–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Malthusians <sigh> .

        The world population growth is something like 1.01% - so what? We over produce food and resources. No one should be hungry except for the incompetence of governments. We'll grow to maybe 10 billion by the end of century and the population will stabilize there. By that point we'll have O'Neill cylinders and be colonizing Mars. Unless we listen to clowns like you.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LyzBoHo5EI

        You can look up all these numbers yourself.

        [–]WalkingIn2Madness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Because the ideal citizen of the New World Order is a husked out, hollow, obedient mass consumer who complies without question.

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Because we need sheeple like you that actually believe you aren't herded.

        Maybe you actually are a dog. But even in this case you mostly won't shine with your intellect.

        A Boxer-lookalike i'd guess.

        Somebody has to swing the bat. Sure as hell i won't do it. :)