SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/JasonCarswell or keep it around?

submitted by ActuallyNot from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Optimus85 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (8 children)

Seconded.

[–]JasonCarswell 10 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 6 fun -  (6 children)

I'd be willing to make it all or nothing. Vote me out - or vote socks and ActuallyNot out. Forever. I'd honour the community decision. They wouldn't likely as they're here being very unpopular for more reasons than just trolling and they may come back as another alias.

Of course, that's not how SaidIt works. But you never know if an exception, or two, could be made.

[–]Optimus85 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

Nah. You're more valuable to the site than the two of them combined.

[–]JasonCarswell 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

Yah. But are they even of value?
0+0=0
0x2=0
JC=>0, better than nuffin.

[–]Optimus85 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

The math checks out.

[–]forscher 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No shit, captain obvious. As long as we assume (which simple minds automatically do) we are calculating in fields and the relations are all transitive.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Add the Shalom guy to sucks and AN, and you have a deal!

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Sprinkle on a few others too if you like.

[–]forscher 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is.