use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~6 users here now
Ask the community of saidit a question!
SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?
submitted 2 years ago * by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Node 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago (4 children)
Tell me if I'm "doing it wrong", but blocking socks has also blocked a large number of comment threads. (Can I block a user and still see the replies that follow in that thread?)
But it's surprising how easily one can detect replies to socks in s/all/comments. There's a level of frustration and annoyance that seems unique to his interlocutors. Then you click on context and get the "there's nothing here" message.
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (3 children)
I don't think you are doing anything wrong, that is just how the block function works.
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)
The block function is VERY incomplete.
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
Yes! Too bad they aren't interested in fixing things here.
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
Too bad they aren't interested in fixing things here.
I wouldn't go that far.
There's interest, but there's also reality. It's a matter of limited resources, time, energy, coding, and organization with an outdated software that needs a major overhaul for this free platform. At present there is only d3rr. (I suspect it was mostly only him coding before too.) This SaidIt software is on Python 2 I think and soon servers won't be offering that anymore. We may have to build our own server to host the old code, IF we can convince M7 and D3 to relocate it.
In my naive non-coder humble opinion, in an ideal world, we would build three things:
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Node 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun - (4 children)
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)