SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?
submitted 2 years ago * by JasonCarswell from (self.AskSaidIt)
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun - 2 years ago (3 children)
never censor
[–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)
Censorship is one issue you and I will always agree on
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
It's about the rule breaking, not censorship. It's my fault I wasn't clearer. The fact that they spew poison is bonus if they get removed.
[–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
Oh Im sorry Jason, I was just replying to Popper that not censoring people is one thing we can agree on. The socks situation isnt censorship, its habitual rule breaking. Rule breaking gets you put in jail, but habitual rule breaking should get you removed.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~6 users here now
Ask the community of saidit a question!
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun - (3 children)
[–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (2 children)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun - (1 child)
[–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)