SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (8 children)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    But you know - banning?

    I know right? But where do you draw the line? Clearly they KEEP breaking Rule #1 without consequences. For fuck sakes, I've been banned TWICE and resurrected twice - and so far socks has gone completely unscathed as far as I know. Let's just ban them for a month and see what happens, like a little experiment. Make it permanent if desired.

    Lastly, I'm trying to entice my real-life Windsor resistance friends to join this platform. Windsor, SaidIt, and everyone in the world has enough issues to deal with besides asstroll timesucks.

    [–][deleted]  (6 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

      You are basically asking for equal treatment

      The opposite of this.

      Per the title: "Ban /u/socks and ...."

      (It's bullying and a kind of political cleansing, aka politicide; it's not equal treatment.)

      [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

      BULLSHIT. By selectively editing the title's question into a statement rather than a question, you spin more lies again, as always crying /s/Victimhood. Oi vey. More inauthentic spin. But that is besides the point.

      Your perpetual lies, authoritarianism, misinfo, and big pharma shilling are prolific poisons intentionally disrupting SaidIt - but that's secondary and my post failed to clearly distinguish your political infiltrator trolling bullshit from the real issue at hand that will actually get you banned:

      We need to deal with your ongoing RULE BREAKING.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Fact is - I'm not breaking any rules, with the potential (arguable) exception of 2 strikes, recently. You're using that false argument as disinformation propaganda to brigade others into harrassing, bullying, and banning others. You've repeatedly violated rules 1 and 4, and will continue to do so, while pointing at users and telling them that they are violating rule 1, as if you're the SJW here to cleanse Saidit of undesirables (something you've explicitly admitted, to 'cleanup' Saidit). It's pushed people away from Saidit (including me), so you are achieving your goals. But this narcissism (constantintly drawing attention to yourself at all costs) isn't helping Saidit. It's also evil, and the opposite of Saidit's purpose and mission.

      [–]ShalomEveryone 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Well said! That's exactly what he's doing. I always get a kick out of people who break saidit's rules and then go on to accuse others of breaking the very same rules they're breaking.

      Shalom

      ✡️️

      [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Mazel Tov