use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
Ask the community of saidit a question!
SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?
submitted 2 years ago * by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (5 children)
lol
12 hours ago, I defended another user by telling you:
Don't try to ban someone because he/she disagrees with you or others.
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun - 2 years ago* (4 children)
You inauthentic asstroll, for the umpteenth time, it's not about disagreeing with you as a PROVEN LIAR, AUTHORITARIAN, and BIG PHARMA SHILL, it's also that you are a PROBLEMATIC DISRUPTIVE AGENT PERPETUALLY BREAKING THE FEW RULES of SaidIt.
THIS is a perfect example of how, as I'd stated, " They will of course cry /s/Victimhood, distort, spin, lie, deflect, and delay in all manner of ways. "
[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago* (3 children)
Strike 1 for name calling. I'm sorry if you don't understand the rules here, but I'm done trying to explain them to you.
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)
Get the fuck out!?
I gave you a bunch of examples of ActuallyNot and Socks name-calling and you did NOTHING!
I intentionally name-called (it's not my normal modus operandi) to see if you'd actually do anything.
Your selective enforcement of the rules is getting ridiculously suspicious.
[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
I told you like a week ago that I gave socks a strike. He got another one within the last 3 days too, unrelated to interactions with you.
You and actuallynot going back and forth for 10 pages was a heated debate full of both actual arguments and rule breaking insults. Aka not clear rule breaking behavior.
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
Thanks for explaining. I still disagree.
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (5 children)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun - (4 children)
[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - (3 children)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun - (1 child)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun - (0 children)