SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

I suggested that to d3rr a while ago, but in a new dedicated sub and/or wiki - to build up cases on them. But what's the point when the cases are ignored because muhluvuv freezepeaches over rules.

CC /u/Noam_Chomsky

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Feel free to vigilante all you want, but saidit won't be officially involved. If you want to maintain a list of shills and try to encourage people to block them, I see no problem. I remain here to act on serious and clear rule violations. (edit: encouraging downvoting or vote manipulation would be against site rules)

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Feel free to vigilante all you want, but saidit won't be officially involved. If you want to maintain a list of shills and try to encourage people to block them, I see no problem. I remain here to act on serious and clear rule violations. (edit: encouraging downvoting or vote manipulation would be against site rules)

Saved.

I'll do this next week when things have cooled down. I have no interest in overdosing everyone on this custodial shit.

Even if they were worth something, I have no interest in manipulating votes, though it's a good note to share to keep others too enthusiastic on a crusade in check or may be unaware of the rule subtleties.

Which do you think would be better:
https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/wiki/Shills - main wiki
https://saidit.net/s/SaidItCleanup/wiki/ - out of the way (requires mod access)
Or elsewhere?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

none of this can be in the /s/saidit wiki, that's my only input