SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FlippyKing 12 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 6 fun -  (4 children)

won't they just come back as socks2 or bctuallynot? Block them and worry not about their disingenuous trolling

[–]Chipit 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

It's about everyone else being negatively affected by their breaking the few rules we have.

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I agree, my only concerns where about them circumventing bans by creating new accounts. The new users argument, where they'd be turned off to the site by their trolling and ingenuousness, is a good reason to send them packing.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

circumventing bans by creating new accounts

If we don't try we'll never know. If they do come back it proves they're shit disturbers. If they don't no great loss.

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not disagreeing at all.