SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (15 children)

Right. We can cross that bridge when we get to it.

Take down the big two and set an example for the others, like a public execution.

[–][deleted]  (14 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 7 fun4 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

    Scratch a socialist and a jew bleeds

    [–]Node 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    How about the jews first? That solution would solve many (if not most of our) problems.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

    First the globalists and totalitarians

    Then the SJWs and commies

    Then the NeoCons and Nazis

    Then their shills and asstrolls

    Then we're about good.

    [–]Noam_Chomsky 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

    Seems to be an uptick in shill activity.

    Here's a recent example from today.

    https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/8esz/its_like_the_whole_thing_was_staged_or_something/v7oe?context=3 This is probably a positive sign.

    The absurdity of Reddit is causing it's audience to look to less censored alternatives.

    It's damage control for the crumbling Reddit PsyOp.

    They are desperately trying to keep their fraudulent narrative afloat.

    I agree with whomever said they'd just make s new name.

    Rather than banning them, a handful of reliable community members could save a few examples of obscenely obvious shilling from the offending account.

    Then add a link to these obviously dishonest comments, whenever this account is pushing nonsense.

    [–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

    Thats a good idea, like have a pinned thread in s/SaidIt with their insanity

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    I suggested that to d3rr a while ago, but in a new dedicated sub and/or wiki - to build up cases on them. But what's the point when the cases are ignored because muhluvuv freezepeaches over rules.

    CC /u/Noam_Chomsky

    [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    Feel free to vigilante all you want, but saidit won't be officially involved. If you want to maintain a list of shills and try to encourage people to block them, I see no problem. I remain here to act on serious and clear rule violations. (edit: encouraging downvoting or vote manipulation would be against site rules)

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Feel free to vigilante all you want, but saidit won't be officially involved. If you want to maintain a list of shills and try to encourage people to block them, I see no problem. I remain here to act on serious and clear rule violations. (edit: encouraging downvoting or vote manipulation would be against site rules)

    Saved.

    I'll do this next week when things have cooled down. I have no interest in overdosing everyone on this custodial shit.

    Even if they were worth something, I have no interest in manipulating votes, though it's a good note to share to keep others too enthusiastic on a crusade in check or may be unaware of the rule subtleties.

    Which do you think would be better:
    https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/wiki/Shills - main wiki
    https://saidit.net/s/SaidItCleanup/wiki/ - out of the way (requires mod access)
    Or elsewhere?

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    none of this can be in the /s/saidit wiki, that's my only input

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    Leaving just you? Oh, I see now.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    LOL. Leaving a glorious utopia of voluntaryists and cooperatives and unicorns smoking pipe dreams and DMT.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    Jason Carswell: "I oppose censorship"

    Also Jason Carswell: "We need to get rid of...

    First the globalists and totalitarians

    Then the SJWs and commies

    Then the NeoCons and Nazis

    Then their shills and asstrolls

    Then we're about good."

    Hm...

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    I was joking/not joking. We're all paradoxical hypocrites in countless ways. It's the nature of existence.

    If we get rid of the globalists and totalitarians, either the others will collapse or more likely the others will just fill their places. But really, it's their systems and sheeple's beliefs that need to be torn down, or better: new fair alternatives built to replace them.

    Your "gotcha" got nothin. Dwell on it further if you like. Don't expect me to care.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    No, we are not all paradoxical hypocrites. The people YOU know and hang out with, are. Presumed by your assumption that everybody is like that. I know homosexuals who state very seriously that EVERYBODY is either gay or bi. I understand their perspective, it's all they meet.

    There is UNBELIEVABLE strength and power in being monolithic. Being without paradox, without ambiguity, without hypocrisy. It's an extremely worthwhile life goal.

    It isn't a "gotcha" moment. It's a "food for thought" moment.