SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]literalotherkin 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

I think d3rr is right on this one, Jason. I mostly just lurk the DAR sub and of course have had run ins with Socks but I don't think he's malicious he's just extremely dull and one of those people who needs to 'win' internet arguments for some odd reason. Those people always drag a discussion into a long back and forth dick measuring contest including copious citations -- usually always from Wikipedia or a Quora post what he read in Socks case.

I say just ignore or block. There's no need for these people to actually have the ability to drag discussions down outside of what we give them.

Just my two cents.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Socks but I don't think he's malicious

Obviously you haven't had enough exposure.

Thanks for your two cents. It counts. As does everyone's feedback here. It's not a simple matter. But they are clear rule-breakers.