SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]mahavishnunj 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (18 children)

why did you make a new thread that doesnt have my totally relevant comment in it?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (17 children)

Sorry about that. I was having trouble with the thumbnail. Since there were no votes and not comments I re-posted it assuming no one noticed the post yet. It was not intentional.

I see that you said this:

banning anyone is the height of pussy behavior.

A valid view that I also share. However, /u/ActuallyNot and /u/socks are not just anyone. They're proven asstrolls here to disrupt SaidIt, while lying and spreading authoritarian misinformation.

Before you claim I'm intolerant of all asstrolls and want them all banned feel free to look at my interaction earlier today. Like the other two who are much worse, /u/Popper occasionally has some good things to say, though I often throw up a little when I digest /u/Popper's bullshit too. Today's /u/Popper incident was different than I've ever seen as he/she/it/them decided to go full-on asstroll forcing me to make my first moderator ban ever. Our /s/StandUpWindsor community sub is about resisting tyranny in Windsor, Ontario, Canada where I'm quite certain /u/Popper doesn't live. I gave the asstroll many opportunities to apologize for insulting my local community, and me, in front of them, whom I'm trying to entice to SaidIt away from Facebook. Not a good look for SaidIt via the bullshit of Popper.

Yet, in short, I haven't called for /u/Popper to be banned from SaidIt - so far, if ever.

Do not ask me why they're all acting crazy today. Maybe they all got a Mossad memo to up the timesuckage and chaos.

Rule #1 : "If a person is caught repeatedly dragging discussion in a downward direction on the Pyramid of Debate, they will be removed."

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (10 children)

never censor

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

What about the trolls who say "nigger nigger nigger faggot faggot faggot kike kike kike" all over the place?

Let them roam free?

How do you recommend we enforce Rule #1?

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    So, fill the boards up with more timesuck jokes?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Not that I can understand all of this, but it's brilliant.

    [–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    Censorship is one issue you and I will always agree on

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    It's about the rule breaking, not censorship. It's my fault I wasn't clearer. The fact that they spew poison is bonus if they get removed.

    [–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Oh Im sorry Jason, I was just replying to Popper that not censoring people is one thing we can agree on. The socks situation isnt censorship, its habitual rule breaking. Rule breaking gets you put in jail, but habitual rule breaking should get you removed.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Oh you are clear. People are just unable to understand anything outside of their own preconceived ideas.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I thought I was, but I shouldn't have brought up their lies and shilling agendas. People get confused easily and understandably defensive about censorship. Sometimes less is more, and I tend to be too verbose for clarity - but it muddied the water.

    [–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    Popper has always been a scumbag. I mentioned it a long time ago: https://saidit.net/s/news/comments/1qxr/did_greta_thunberg_lie_about_riding_overcrowded/

    [–]Tiwaking {To /u/black_hole_son who is a user I do not like} 1 year ago You and I may not see eye to eye on a lot of things.

    But we can both agree.

    That Popper and bald-janitor are scumbags.

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Many folks on SaidIt are Jekyll & Hyde like them. Popper leans left and BJ leans right, so far as I'm aware. I'd never had a problem with either until that shit.

    [–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    Welcome back snow, and don't be mean to bald-janitor

    [–]Tiwaking 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    Im not snow silly. Snow left and isnt coming back.

    [–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Good, he can kick rocks together with bald-janitor

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Today's /u/Popper incident

    Ngl, that made me chuckle. That's the problem with popplers.