you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Ain't it ?

Indeed.

I believe these mostly are the Catholics.

Nope - this is primarily a Protestant/Calvinist thing (though they learned how to do this from Catholics in the 16th century). Consider the extent to which the Christian-right and megachurches in the US have promoted the hatred of ANYONE who did not agree with the Christian right. Moreover, Protestants, Baptists, Mormons, and other non-Catholics much more commonly promote the belief that ONLY those in their specific Protestant-descended groups will go to heaven. Non-Baptists will go to hell. Non-Mormons will go to hell, &c. Moreover, Jews think non-Jews will go to hell. Muslims think non-Muslims will go to hell (and not get 72 virgins). In short, /s/fschmidt will enjoy a lot of hatred at a magachurch. The only Christians who genuinely try to love all others are the Society of Friends ('Quakers' - and in partial credit to your point, these are Protestants).

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

You possibly can copy Carswells style of argumentation. This even got him very upset. So upset that at this point in time he even spends energy to fight you. Mainly because he is concerned how "western" societies develop.

You even can copy fschmidt.

You never can copy entropy.

That is what i am.

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Don't speak for me.

Socks doesn't argue. He sows chaos and division and evades real debate because he cannot defend his bullshit.

I am not upset. I aim to clean up Saidit by dealing with socks. If you were as observant as you claim, you'd understand this.

[–]Ponderer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I got halfway through reading his comment, getting more and more confused, until I got to "magachurch" and realized it was socks posting.

I've never blocked any user before, but in his case, I think it's warranted

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You can' even take help yourself. That one makes me feel sad. I never did speak in your name. Because i GOT only this account and it will stay this way.

You know that i got more people in my family that are like you than you can even grasps. This means that even what i did, i did with an open hard.

There is in fact a kind of difference between 'lawful' and 'chaotic' personalities.

Because in fact persons associated with a 'lawful' character (person who supposedly are mighty) rather take an overstep here or there.

Person that are 'chaotic' mostly never change their orientation. They just got more flex than you can shield even now.

I could change from 'neutral' to 'good' or 'bad'. But this was a choice (think about this paradox, before putting me into any barrels of yours).

Nonetheless i'd never completely turn into my enemy just to "win".

You were used by /u/socks because several times times now. So you reflect this on me. I am NOT your enemy. I try to protect you. But even that doesn't work ok. We gotta change methods here.

I am a severely good advisor bc. i don't only incorporate ADHS with Asperger-Autism.

I know how languages operate, because 90 % of my time in math i spend like i liked it. In Linguistics. Mostly.

So if you ever crawl up on my ass again: Don't. I'm on the spectrum. You are mainly loved for your posts.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

All talk, you pretend to know but haven't a clue.

Your ego, inflated phony intellectualism, and abstract riddles are tiresome and boring.

Actually do something notable, or provide food for thought, if you want a real discussion.

I'll waste time nor entertain you no further.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thank you for your response.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

And you: i will hit again.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My comment was in support of you, not against.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, thanks anyway,